https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94030
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93889
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Fixed.
||2020-02-23
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Let's see.
||2020-02-23
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Let's take this one as git practice.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93599
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 47854
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47854=edit
Another atte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93599
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Hi Jerry,
this is without Janne's patch (which, as far as I see, concerns
handling I/O when the threads have already started).
Regarding testing: I could not get the original test case to fail
on gcc135, a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93599
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 47800
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47800=edit
Possible fix
Here is something that Nicolas and I came up with. The theory is that
pthread_cond_wait can get a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93599
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Update: I am not convinced that the error message by helgrind is correct.
I have been able to reproduce the error in the meantime, by running
the test case with
#! /bin/sh
set -e
while true
do
for a in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93599
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93498
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #3)
> Patch is against svn r280157.
>
> Index: gcc/fortran/check.c
> ===
> --- gcc/fortran/check.c
||2020-01-20
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org,
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92805
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #6)
> No. I do not do git and have little time/need/interest
> in learning.
In that case, I hope you don't mind if I take this up.
I'm just learning git myself (having
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91640
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10 Regression] ICE: |[9 Regression] ICE:
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
I'm a bit confused about this PR.
Is there anything to fix?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92805
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Hi Steve,
> Index: gcc/fortran/primary.c
> ===
> --- gcc/fortran/primary.c (revision 279052)
> +++ gcc/fortran/primary.c (working
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92836
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #15)
> Did we conclude that this is an expected race condition?
>
> I run the example comment 14 and it just hangs for me.
It's certainly not mandated to work, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44960
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65428
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 65428, which changed state.
Bug 65428 Summary: ICE on nest array constructor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65428
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65428
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Jan 9 20:57:33 2020
New Revision: 280063
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=280063=gcc=rev
Log:
Save typespec for empty array constructor.
2020-01-09 Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67202
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host|67202 |
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||2020-01-05
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Confirmed.
||2020-01-05
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87797
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Could be made an addition to -Wintrinsic-shadow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45596
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91640
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|tkoenig at gcc
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Should be rather simple to fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91648
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|tkoenig at gcc
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93113
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93113
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Jan 1 21:40:35 2020
New Revision: 279821
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279821=gcc=rev
Log:
Handle REF_INQUIRY for dependency checking.
2020-01-01 Thomas Koenig
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
We could be using span instead of creating a temporary array here:
$ cat x.f90
module x
type y
real :: a, b
end type y
contains
subroutine foo
type(y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93113
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Reduced test case:
program main
complex, dimension(10,10) :: a
a%re = a%re - 0.5
end program main
||2020-01-01
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
$ cat matmul.f90
program main
complex, dimension(:,:), allocatable :: a,b,c
read (*,*) n
allocate (a(n,n), b(n,n), c(n,n))
call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31016
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
Correction: The rank-1 copying cases are now handled by the middle end,
the two-dimensional case isn't.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31016
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
Excellent news: The __builtin_memcpy cases have been fixed in the
meantime, and using __builtin_memset for values of more than one
byte doesn't work.
I will commit a test case and then close.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92961
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92961
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 30 15:29:30 2019
New Revision: 279770
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279770=gcc=rev
Log:
Catch division by zero errors in array sizes.
2019-12-30 Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92961
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 30 15:27:08 2019
New Revision: 279769
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279769=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-12-30 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/92961
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to MarkEggleston from comment #6)
> This has been fixed, see comment 5.
>
> I do not have permission to changes the status so somebody
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92961
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|93104 |
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93104
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93104
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/10 Regression] Current |[10 Regression] Current
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93104
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92993
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92961
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||93104
Target Milestone|---
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |keremkat+gcc at gmail
dot com
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Kerem Kat from comment #4)
> Please assign to me.
Happy to oblige.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92961
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 30 13:10:37 2019
New Revision: 279767
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279767=gcc=rev
Log:
Catch division by zero errors in array sizes.
2019-12-30 Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91651
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 30 12:35:05 2019
New Revision: 279766
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279766=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-12-30 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/91651
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91541
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14)
> And please also fix the comment in the new test.
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #13)
> (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #12)
> > (In reply
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47567
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47567=edit
config.log
Not sure if this is a gcc 8 or a trunk issue.
With tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91651
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91651
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 30 10:47:39 2019
New Revision: 279765
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279765=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-12-30 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/91651
Fix PR numbers in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91541
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91651
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 30 10:43:38 2019
New Revision: 279763
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279763=gcc=rev
Log:
Remove KIND argument from INDEX so it does not mess up scalarization.
2019-12-30
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92961
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|10.0|9.2.1
Summary|[8/9/10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91541
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 30 10:43:38 2019
New Revision: 279763
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279763=gcc=rev
Log:
Remove KIND argument from INDEX so it does not mess up scalarization.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92961
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 30 10:34:11 2019
New Revision: 279762
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279762=gcc=rev
Log:
Catch division by zero errors in array sizes.
2019-12-30 Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91310
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91310
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Comment on attachment 46648
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46648
test case 1
Oops, correction. If len is small enough, the test case can be
valid (well, it could be if str was ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91310
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||2019-12-23
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92976
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91661
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92738
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 92738, which changed state.
Bug 92738 Summary: [10 regression] Large code size growth for -O2 binaries
between 2019-05-19...2019-05-29
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92738
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512
--- Comment #23 from Thomas Koenig ---
Could you check if this still occurs if you use -finline-arg-packing?
||2019-12-20
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Still fails with current trunk; not fixed with the fix for PR92781.
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Fixed, then. Thanks for the patch and the bug report!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512
--- Comment #22 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Dec 20 11:51:05 2019
New Revision: 279639
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279639=gcc=rev
Log:
Introduce -finline-arg-packing.
2019-12-20 Thomas Koenig
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92738
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Dec 20 11:51:05 2019
New Revision: 279639
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279639=gcc=rev
Log:
Introduce -finline-arg-packing.
2019-12-20 Thomas Koenig
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92958
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Also seen on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92958
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
||2019-12-15
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|ICE in |[F03] Implement KIND
|gfc_trans_assignment_1, at |argument for INDEX
|fortran/trans-expr.c:11010 |
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87103
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andreas at skeidsvoll dot no
---
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Let's mark it as such, then.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 87103 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92913
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #47483|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92114
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92913
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 47483
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47483=edit
concept patch for subroutine vs. function
Here is a concept patch for subroutine vs. function. I have moved
this
||2019-12-11
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
I'll see what I can do.
I think this is still something that we could do for the gcc 10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90350
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91643
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91643
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Dec 10 21:59:09 2019
New Revision: 279203
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279203=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-12-10 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/91643
* trans-array.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89047
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to G. Steinmetz from comment #4)
> Where does this line come from ?
> >18 | c = g
Nowhere (as fas as this PR is concerned). Different test case,
please disregard comment #3.
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89047
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92863
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92863
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Dec 10 18:31:33 2019
New Revision: 279180
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279180=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-12-10 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/92863
* misc.c (gfc_typename): If
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92863
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
This looks reasonable:
Index: misc.c
===
--- misc.c (Revision 279064)
+++ misc.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -164,9 +164,17 @@ gfc_typename
||2019-12-09
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Probably
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92836
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 47441
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47441=edit
Output of valgrind --tool=helgrind
The code from https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-12/msg00020.html :
program
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92191
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #10 from Thomas
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Here's where it segfaults with 7.4.0:
(gdb) r
Starting program: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/7.4.0/f951.exe tst.f
-ffixed-form -quiet -dumpbase tst.f -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -auxbase tst
-g -ffpe-trap=zero
601 - 700 of 3579 matches
Mail list logo
