[Bug web/45655] New: GCC WIki Needs Text Colorizing Capability

: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: web AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tom dot browder at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45655

[Bug preprocessor/45599] New: Remove all code applying to obsolete #pragma once

: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: preprocessor AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tom dot browder at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45599

[Bug preprocessor/45599] Remove all code applying to obsolete #pragma once

--- Comment #2 from tom dot browder at gmail dot com 2010-09-08 15:02 --- Ah, you are correct--old code may have that only. How about a warning instead about using the recommended construct (the header guard) instead of the pragma once? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

[Bug preprocessor/45599] Remove all code applying to obsolete #pragma once

--- Comment #4 from tom dot browder at gmail dot com 2010-09-08 15:29 --- Oops, I missed that PR. I still think that an optional warning should be there--something like -Wpragma-once with a message about the better practice. (Sorry I missed finding the original bug--I only looked

[Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6

--- Comment #34 from tom dot browder at gmail dot com 2010-09-07 17:58 --- (In reply to comment #33) I guess you meant to be CC'ed? Yes. The work I started was a Perl script to convert a 2.20+ database to the latest version. The last question I had of Daniel was could we get

[Bug c++/45555] New: Add warnings for changes to code with option -fipa-sra

: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tom dot browder at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4

[Bug bootstrap/45556] New: Add PPL and CLooG-PPL source to gcc source tree for build

AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tom dot browder at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45556

[Bug other/45503] New: make distclean Does Not Remove All Local Configuration Data

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tom dot browder at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45503

[Bug fortran/38830] New: Add Variable Format Expression I/O Capability

ReportedBy: tom dot browder at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38830

[Bug fortran/38830] Add Variable Format Expression I/O Capability

--- Comment #3 from tom dot browder at gmail dot com 2009-01-14 00:10 --- I'm sorry I didn't catch the original bug. I did search but missed the obvious reference. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38830

[Bug fortran/38773] New: Arithmetic Overflow with Integer Parameter Assignment

Overflow with Integer Parameter Assignment Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tom dot browder

[Bug fortran/38773] Arithmetic Overflow with Integer Parameter Assignment

--- Comment #1 from tom dot browder at gmail dot com 2009-01-09 01:13 --- Created an attachment (id=17060) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17060action=view) Program demonstrating the overflow error. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38773

[Bug fortran/38773] Arithmetic Overflow with Integer Parameter Assignment

--- Comment #2 from tom dot browder at gmail dot com 2009-01-09 01:14 --- Created an attachment (id=17061) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17061action=view) Output from gfortran with -v --save-temps -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38773

[Bug fortran/38672] New: ICE during build with versions 4.3.2 and 4.4-20081226

Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tom dot browder at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet

[Bug fortran/38672] ICE during build with versions 4.3.2 and 4.4-20081226

--- Comment #1 from tom dot browder at gmail dot com 2008-12-30 13:09 --- Created an attachment (id=17014) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17014action=view) Output from gfortan -v -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38672

[Bug fortran/38672] ICE during build with versions 4.3.2 and 4.4-20081226

--- Comment #2 from tom dot browder at gmail dot com 2008-12-30 13:11 --- Created an attachment (id=17015) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17015action=view) Archive with files to demonstrate the bug. The Makefile has a variable at the top to pick specific

[Bug other/37210] Prohibit Default Builds in the GCC Source Tree

--- Comment #2 from tom dot browder at gmail dot com 2008-08-24 22:07 --- Andrew, you're right--it's not prohibited, but my argument is that it should be prohibited as the default build (but have a specific configure variable to allow it), at least until it is tested. Over the years

[Bug other/37210] New: Prohibit Default Builds in the GCC Source Tree

Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tom dot browder at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37210

[Bug c++/34198] -Wconversion gives apparent erroneous warning with g++ 4.3-20071109

--- Comment #15 from tom dot browder at gmail dot com 2007-11-24 02:36 --- Tried: g++ -c -Wconversion test_conversion.cc using g++ trunk of svn version 30392 and had no warnings. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34198

[Bug c++/34198] New: -Wconversion gives apparent erroneous warning with g++ 4.3-20071109

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tom dot browder at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34198

[Bug c++/34198] -Wconversion gives apparent erroneous warning with g++ 4.3-20071109

--- Comment #2 from tom dot browder at gmail dot com 2007-11-22 21:37 --- Created an attachment (id=14617) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14617action=view) Intermediate file produced by g++-4.3-20071109 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34198

[Bug c++/34198] -Wconversion gives apparent erroneous warning with g++ 4.3-20071109

--- Comment #1 from tom dot browder at gmail dot com 2007-11-22 21:35 --- Created an attachment (id=14616) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14616action=view) Output from running: g++-4.3-20071109 -v -save-temps -c test_conversion.cc -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug c++/34198] -Wconversion gives apparent erroneous warning with g++ 4.3-20071109

--- Comment #6 from tom dot browder at gmail dot com 2007-11-23 02:03 --- Created an attachment (id=14623) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14623action=view) Output from running: g++-4.3-20071109 -v -save-temps -c -wconversion test_conversion.cc -- tom dot browder

[Bug c++/34198] -Wconversion gives apparent erroneous warning with g++ 4.3-20071109

--- Comment #7 from tom dot browder at gmail dot com 2007-11-23 02:05 --- Created an attachment (id=14624) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14624action=view) Intermediate file produced by g++-4.3-20071109 -- tom dot browder at gmail dot com changed