[Bug middle-end/113636] New: internal compiler error: in dead_debug_global_find, at valtrack.cc:275

2024-01-28 Thread toon at moene dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113636 Bug ID: 113636 Summary: internal compiler error: in dead_debug_global_find, at valtrack.cc:275 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/111218] New: Conflict in BIND(C) INTERFACEs in two Modules leads to ICE.

2023-08-28 Thread toon at moene dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111218 Bug ID: 111218 Summary: Conflict in BIND(C) INTERFACEs in two Modules leads to ICE. Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/97589] Segementation fault when allocating coarrays.

2021-09-09 Thread toon at moene dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97589 --- Comment #29 from Toon Moene --- On 9/8/21 10:05 PM, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97589 > > anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: > > What|Removed |Added >

[Bug fortran/97589] Segementation fault when allocating coarrays.

2020-11-28 Thread toon at moene dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97589 --- Comment #27 from Toon Moene --- Yes, I am now convince this works (64 leads to stop 1, but 63 works). Note that I slightly changed the program today, to add a sync all before the forecasting loop, and adding one to the copy_local_to_global

[Bug fortran/97589] Segementation fault when allocating coarrays.

2020-11-27 Thread toon at moene dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97589 --- Comment #25 from Toon Moene --- BTW, the speed difference between the native and the OpenMPI based program is staggering. For a 936x770x60 grid, the native run takes around 14 seconds elapsed time, while the OpenMPI based one takes 2 minutes

[Bug fortran/97589] Segementation fault when allocating coarrays.

2020-11-27 Thread toon at moene dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97589 --- Comment #24 from Toon Moene --- And I can reproduce the GFORTRAN_NUM_IMAGES=64 segfault: (export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/toon/compilers/install/coarray_native/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/11.0.0; export GFORTRAN_NUM_IMAGES=64; echo '

[Bug fortran/97589] Segementation fault when allocating coarrays.

2020-11-27 Thread toon at moene dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97589 --- Comment #23 from Toon Moene --- The segfault at GFORTRAN_NUM_IMAGES=64 might be due to the fact that the program doesn't contain a check whether the size of the boundary relaxation zone (currently set to 4) is too large for the slabs. The

[Bug fortran/97589] Segementation fault when allocating coarrays.

2020-11-22 Thread toon at moene dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97589 --- Comment #20 from Toon Moene --- Example of the problem described in the last comment: (export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/toon/compilers/install/coarray_native/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/11.0.0; export GFORTRAN_NUM_IMAGES=28; echo '

[Bug fortran/97589] Segementation fault when allocating coarrays.

2020-11-22 Thread toon at moene dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97589 --- Comment #19 from Toon Moene --- Thanks. It works now for export GFORTRAN_NUM_IMAGES=1..10 for me. Unfortunately, when I want to change the nxglobal and nyglobal values in the domain via the namelist, sometimes the "default" values are

[Bug fortran/97589] Segementation fault when allocating coarrays.

2020-11-15 Thread toon at moene dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97589 --- Comment #11 from Toon Moene --- Created attachment 49564 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49564=edit The full program I am testing. This is the full program I am testing. I have compiled it as follows (after building

[Bug fortran/97589] Segementation fault when allocating coarrays.

2020-11-14 Thread toon at moene dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97589 Toon Moene changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/97589] Segementation fault when allocating coarrays.

2020-11-10 Thread toon at moene dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97589 --- Comment #7 from Toon Moene --- I agree - the coarrays should be the same size and the program should just only *use* the part that it needs. I also got an error with the caf-mpi library, but that one was impossible to understand (in fact,

[Bug fortran/97589] New: Segementation fault when allocating coarrays.

2020-10-27 Thread toon at moene dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97589 Bug ID: 97589 Summary: Segementation fault when allocating coarrays. Product: gcc Version: coarray_native Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/97530] Segmentation fault compiling coarray program with option -fcoarray=shared (not with -fcoarray={lib,single})

2020-10-24 Thread toon at moene dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97530 --- Comment #1 from Toon Moene --- Created attachment 49437 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49437=edit Reduced test case. I managed to reduce the failing program.

[Bug fortran/97530] New: Segmentation fault compiling coarray program with option -fcoarray=shared (not with -fcoarray={lib,single})

2020-10-22 Thread toon at moene dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97530 Bug ID: 97530 Summary: Segmentation fault compiling coarray program with option -fcoarray=shared (not with -fcoarray={lib,single}) Product: gcc Version: 11.0