https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
--- Comment #31 from Lawrence Velázquez ---
(In reply to m...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #27)
> Fixed in 6.0. Backports pre approved after bake time and testing that
> includes older darwins and ppc.
Thanks! I've attached updated patches against 4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34012|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34011|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34010|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
--- Comment #25 from Lawrence Velázquez ---
(In reply to m...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #22)
> Though I approved it on list, you should feel free to update with the review
> points others have and post that version if you wish.
Re-roll posted:
ht
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
--- Comment #23 from Lawrence Velázquez ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #21)
> - version_as_legacy_macro(): same issue. Why do we need to handle major <=
> 9? You have rejected this possibility in macosx_version_as_macro()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
--- Comment #20 from Lawrence Velázquez ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #18)
> (In reply to Lawrence Velázquez from comment #17)
>
> Hey Lawrence, do you have a copyright assignment in place with the FSF? If
> so, please su
