https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255
--- Comment #7 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #6)
> (In reply to wilco from comment #5)
> > (In reply to avieira from comment #4)
> > > OK so after some extra debugging and digging I found t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255
wilco at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78453
wilco at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308
--- Comment #59 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #58)
> (In reply to wilco from comment #57)
> > (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #56)
> > > Agreed, I can split the patch.
> &
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308
--- Comment #57 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #56)
> (In reply to wilco from comment #55)
> > (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #39)
> > > Created attachment 39940 [details]
&g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308
--- Comment #55 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #39)
> Created attachment 39940 [details]
> proposed patch, v2
>
> last upload was accidentally truncated.
> uploaded the right patch.
R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61056
wilco at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308
--- Comment #51 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #49)
> (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #48)
> > (In reply to wilco from comment #22)
> > >
> > > Anyway, there is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308
--- Comment #47 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #46)
> (In reply to wilco from comment #44)
> > (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #38)
> > > Created attachment 39939 [detai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308
--- Comment #44 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #38)
> Created attachment 39939 [details]
> proposed patch, v2
>
> Unlike the previous patch, thumb1 stack usage stays at 1588 bytes,
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308
--- Comment #42 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #40)
> BTW: I found something strange in this pattern in neon.md:
>
> (define_insn_and_split "orndi3_neon"
> [(s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308
--- Comment #41 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #40)
> BTW: I found something strange in this pattern in neon.md:
>
> (define_insn_and_split "orndi3_neon"
> [(s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308
--- Comment #36 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #34)
> (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #33)
> > (In reply to Wilco from comment #32)
> > > (In reply to Bernd Edlinge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308
--- Comment #35 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #30)
> (In reply to wilco from comment #29)
> > Combine could help with
> > merging 2 loads/stores into a single instruction.
>
&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308
--- Comment #29 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #28)
> With my latest patch I bootstrapped a configuration with
> --with-arch=armv7-a --with-tune=cortex-a9 --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16
> --with-float=ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308
--- Comment #27 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #26)
> (In reply to wilco from comment #25)
> >
> > Alternatives can be disabled, there are flags, eg:
> >
> > (set_a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308
--- Comment #25 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #24)
> (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #23)
> > @@ -5020,7 +5020,7 @@
> > (define_insn_and_split "one_cmpldi2"
> &g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308
--- Comment #22 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #21)
> (In reply to wilco from comment #20)
> > > Wilco, where have you seen the additional registers used with my
> > > previous pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308
--- Comment #20 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #19)
> I think the problem with anddi iordi and xordi instructions is that
> they obscure the data flow between low and high half words.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308
wilco at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78041
--- Comment #17 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #15)
> FYI: You could merge the two alternatives into one.
>
> =?r,?
> 0, r
> i, i
>
> is equivalent to
>
> =?
&g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78041
--- Comment #16 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: wilco
Date: Tue Oct 25 10:25:28 2016
New Revision: 241508
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241508=gcc=rev
Log:
With -fpu=neon DI mode shifts are expanded after reload. DI mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78041
wilco at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69619
--- Comment #6 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: wilco
Date: Thu Feb 4 18:23:35 2016
New Revision: 233145
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233145=gcc=rev
Log:
This patch fixes an exponential issue in ccmp.c. When deciding which
701 - 724 of 724 matches
Mail list logo
