[Bug target/102027] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ABI break when using vector type in function arg/return value

2023-04-17 Thread woodard at redhat dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102027 --- Comment #10 from Ben Woodard --- Currently Libabigail is not able to detect this kind of ABI break. We would be able to detect this if https://dwarfstd.org/issues/221105.1.html were implemented. As mentioned in the DWARF issue, this would

[Bug debug/109346] New: RFE add DW_AT_location to DW_TAG_subprogram

2023-03-30 Thread woodard at redhat dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109346 Bug ID: 109346 Summary: RFE add DW_AT_location to DW_TAG_subprogram Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libgcc/109054] _Unwind_GetLanguageSpecificData should have protected visibility

2023-03-07 Thread woodard at redhat dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109054 Ben Woodard changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgcc/109054] _Unwind_GetLanguageSpecificData should have protected visibility

2023-03-07 Thread woodard at redhat dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109054 --- Comment #3 from Ben Woodard --- Actually what we were hoping to achieve was not to substitute another version of _Unwind_GetLanguageSpecificData for the one that is in libgcc_s.so but rather to make it so that that another implementation of

[Bug libgcc/109054] New: _Unwind_GetLanguageSpecificData should have protected visibility

2023-03-07 Thread woodard at redhat dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109054 Bug ID: 109054 Summary: _Unwind_GetLanguageSpecificData should have protected visibility Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/102534] RFE epilog is not reliably a statement with inlining

2021-09-30 Thread woodard at redhat dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102534 --- Comment #4 from Ben Woodard --- There continues to be an instruction after the completion of the inlining, the next instruction in the sequence, At the time when the inlining occurs why can’t the .loc 1 6 1 be placed there as part of the

[Bug debug/102534] New: RFE epilog is not reliably a statement

2021-09-29 Thread woodard at redhat dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102534 Bug ID: 102534 Summary: RFE epilog is not reliably a statement Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug

[Bug debug/102523] New: Assume -fvar-tracking -fvar-tracking-assignments when compiling with -O0 -g

2021-09-28 Thread woodard at redhat dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102523 Bug ID: 102523 Summary: Assume -fvar-tracking -fvar-tracking-assignments when compiling with -O0 -g Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: