[Bug lto/50351] An internal compiler error when building gcc4.6 using -flto -fuse-linker-plugin on Win7 mingw64 target

2013-12-06 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50351 --- Comment #7 from xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #6) I rechecked reported issue with current trunk-version and didn't saw this ICE anymore. Also with newer 4.7 version I can't reproduce issue

[Bug target/53967] GCC produces slow code for convolution algorithm with -mfpmath=sse (the AMD_64 default)

2012-08-12 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53967 --- Comment #18 from xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2012-08-12 15:41:35 UTC --- Is the bug related with PR19780?

[Bug gcov-profile/47618] Collecting multiple profiles and using all for PGO

2012-07-22 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618 xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xunxun1982 at gmail

[Bug lto/49922] I try to build libgmp using PGO and lto, but the test will result in internal compiler error

2012-05-07 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49922 --- Comment #3 from xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2012-05-07 13:27:43 UTC --- Using gcc4.7 can't reproduce the issue. Mark it invalid or resolved?

[Bug lto/49844] Building CodeBlocks on Windows using mingw gcc 4.6.1 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin results in many linker stage errors

2012-05-07 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49844 --- Comment #8 from xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2012-05-07 13:44:47 UTC --- GCC4.7 also has the problem now: - g++.exe -shared -Wl,--out-implib=devel

[Bug lto/49844] Building CodeBlocks on Windows using mingw gcc 4.6.1 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin results in many linker stage errors

2012-05-07 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49844 --- Comment #9 from xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2012-05-07 13:46:30 UTC --- Also add -flto-partition=none to linker option can solve the issue.

[Bug lto/49844] Building CodeBlocks on Windows using mingw gcc 4.6.1 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin results in many linker stage errors

2012-05-07 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49844 --- Comment #11 from xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2012-05-07 13:59:49 UTC --- Also add -flto-partition=none to linker option can solve the issue.(In reply to comment #10) These are all references to virtual tables taken local. Maybe Honza

[Bug c++/52446] New: GCC 4.7.0 can't build some templates, but gcc4.6 branch svn can

2012-03-01 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52446 Bug #: 52446 Summary: GCC 4.7.0 can't build some templates, but gcc4.6 branch svn can Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/52446] GCC 4.7.0 can't build some templates, but gcc4.6 branch svn can

2012-03-01 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52446 xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/52446] GCC 4.7.0 can't build some templates, but gcc4.6 branch svn can

2012-03-01 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52446 --- Comment #3 from xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2012-03-01 08:10:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) This is an expected and documented change. See http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/porting_to.html (Name lookup changes). Thanks. I

[Bug c++/52446] GCC 4.7.0 can't build some templates, but gcc4.6 branch svn can

2012-03-01 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52446 xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/42118] Slow forall

2012-02-29 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42118 xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xunxun1982 at gmail

[Bug libgomp/52240] New: Using -fopenmp compile some No-OpenMP program, running will receive signal SIGSEGV

2012-02-13 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52240 Bug #: 52240 Summary: Using -fopenmp compile some No-OpenMP program, running will receive signal SIGSEGV Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2

[Bug c/50922] infinite loop when optimized

2011-10-30 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50922 xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xunxun1982 at gmail

[Bug tree-optimization/50905] New: Gcc4.6.x's -ftree-parallelize-loops is effective only when using -O2/-O3 -ffast-math

2011-10-28 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50905 Bug #: 50905 Summary: Gcc4.6.x's -ftree-parallelize-loops is effective only when using -O2/-O3 -ffast-math Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2

[Bug tree-optimization/50905] Gcc4.6.x's -ftree-parallelize-loops is effective only when using -O2/-O3 -ffast-math

2011-10-28 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50905 xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/50905] Gcc4.6.x's -ftree-parallelize-loops is effective only when using -O2/-O3 -ffast-math

2011-10-28 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50905 --- Comment #4 from xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-10-28 20:14:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Yes if you mean without -O1/-O2/-O3 -ftree-parallelize-loops does not work, this is expected as explained in the manual, -O1 enables

[Bug fortran/50875] O3 and -march=native lead to internal compiler error: in find_reloads

2011-10-26 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875 xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xunxun1982 at gmail

[Bug fortran/50875] O3 and -march=native lead to internal compiler error: in find_reloads

2011-10-26 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875 --- Comment #3 from xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-10-26 16:35:38 UTC --- The issue is related with -mavx I use gfortran -O3 -mavx to reproduce the problem.

[Bug other/50664] GDB rebuilt by i686-w64-mingw32-gcc4.6.2's -Os crashed when debugging, but -O2 is OK.

2011-10-20 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50664 --- Comment #1 from xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-10-20 06:39:17 UTC --- gcc-4.6.2-RC-20111019 has not the problem. May be solved.

[Bug other/50664] GDB rebuilt by i686-w64-mingw32-gcc4.6.2's -Os crashed when debugging, but -O2 is OK.

2011-10-20 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50664 xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libfortran/50016] [4.7 Regression] Drastic I/O performance regression on Windows

2011-10-20 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50016 --- Comment #18 from xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-10-20 06:49:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) Author: burnus Date: Wed Oct 19 17:27:03 2011 New Revision: 180199 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180199 Log

[Bug libfortran/50016] [4.7 Regression] Drastic I/O performance regression on Windows

2011-10-18 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50016 --- Comment #16 from xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-10-18 13:20:27 UTC --- Good job. I will extract the patch to 4.6.1 release. ( I don't use gcc4.6 latest branch temporarily because PR 50664 ) Thanks.

[Bug other/50664] New: GDB rebuilt by i686-w64-mingw32-gcc4.6.2's -Os crahed when debuging, but -O2 is OK.

2011-10-08 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50664 Bug #: 50664 Summary: GDB rebuilt by i686-w64-mingw32-gcc4.6.2's -Os crahed when debuging, but -O2 is OK. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2

[Bug lto/50432] lto1.exe: internal compiler error: in cgraph_mark_functions_to_output, at cgraphunit.c:1173 when build Qt4.7.4 rcc

2011-09-18 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50432 --- Comment #2 from xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-09-19 00:46:03 UTC --- It's strange that after I update to gcc4.6.2.20110916, the issue is gone. I review my earlier build process, and I found that the issue only came out if you built

[Bug lto/50429] New: LibGOMP built with -flto will result in crash code for OpenMP program...

2011-09-16 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50429 Bug #: 50429 Summary: LibGOMP built with -flto will result in crash code for OpenMP program... Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status:

[Bug lto/50429] LibGOMP built with -flto will result in crash code for OpenMP program...

2011-09-16 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50429 --- Comment #1 from xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-09-16 10:29:50 UTC --- Created attachment 25303 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25303 The

[Bug lto/50429] LibGOMP built with -flto will result in crash code for OpenMP program...

2011-09-16 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50429 --- Comment #2 from xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-09-16 10:31:14 UTC --- sorry, I put a wrong test program. The newer is right.

[Bug lto/50429] LibGOMP built with -flto will result in crash code for OpenMP program...

2011-09-16 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50429 --- Comment #3 from xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-09-16 10:36:21 UTC --- It's my fault. I think this is not libgomp and lto issue, and that's the libpthread's problem. Close it.

[Bug lto/50429] LibGOMP built with -flto will result in crash code for OpenMP program...

2011-09-16 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50429 xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug lto/50432] New: lto1.exe: internal compiler error: in cgraph_mark_functions_to_output, at cgraphunit.c:1173 when build Qt4.7.4 rcc

2011-09-16 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50432 Bug #: 50432 Summary: lto1.exe: internal compiler error: in cgraph_mark_functions_to_output, at cgraphunit.c:1173 when build Qt4.7.4 rcc Classification: Unclassified

[Bug lto/50432] lto1.exe: internal compiler error: in cgraph_mark_functions_to_output, at cgraphunit.c:1173 when build Qt4.7.4 rcc

2011-09-16 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50432 --- Comment #1 from xunxun xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-09-16 14:08:45 UTC --- Created attachment 25305 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25305 -v output log Add -v output log

[Bug lto/50351] An internal compiler error when building gcc4.6 using -flto -fuse-linker-plugin on Win7 mingw64 target

2011-09-12 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50351 --- Comment #2 from PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-09-12 12:52:11 UTC --- Created attachment 25247 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25247 Eric Botcazou's testcase

[Bug lto/50351] An internal compiler error when building gcc4.6 using -flto -fuse-linker-plugin on Win7 mingw64 target

2011-09-12 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50351 --- Comment #3 from PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-09-12 12:55:55 UTC --- Using Eric Botcazou's test case, it also has the problem. gcc lex.c has no problem gcc -flto -fuse-linker-plugin lex.c it shows In file included from lex.c:15:0

[Bug lto/50351] An internal compiler error when building gcc4.6 using -flto -fuse-linker-plugin on Win7 mingw64 target

2011-09-12 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50351 --- Comment #4 from PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-09-12 13:00:37 UTC --- So I think that will affect all x86 target LTO build.

[Bug lto/50351] An internal compiler error when building gcc4.6 using -flto -fuse-linker-plugin on Win7 mingw64 target

2011-09-12 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50351 PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target|*-*-mingw* |*-*-mingw32

[Bug lto/50351] New: An internal compiler error when building gcc4.6 using -flto -fuse-linker-plugin on Win7 mingw64 target

2011-09-11 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50351 Bug #: 50351 Summary: An internal compiler error when building gcc4.6 using -flto -fuse-linker-plugin on Win7 mingw64 target Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version:

[Bug lto/50351] An internal compiler error when building gcc4.6 using -flto -fuse-linker-plugin on Win7 mingw64 target

2011-09-11 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50351 PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.6.1, 4.7.0

[Bug lto/49844] Building CodeBlocks on Windows using mingw gcc 4.6.1 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin results in many linker stage errors

2011-08-21 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49844 --- Comment #6 from PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-08-21 15:28:43 UTC --- I update to gcc 4.6.2 (20110819) and binutils 2.21.53.20110820, and it also has the problem.

[Bug lto/49677] GCC 4.6.0 LTO files not compatible with GCC 4.6.1

2011-08-21 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49677 PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xunxun1982 at gmail dot

[Bug lto/49844] Building CodeBlocks on Windows using mingw gcc 4.6.1 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin results in many linker stage errors

2011-08-18 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49844 --- Comment #5 from PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-08-18 20:24:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) I also report to binutils bugzilla: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13031 But no one reply. :(

[Bug fortran/44698] I/O: FLUSH does not actually flush the buffer?

2011-08-09 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44698 PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xunxun1982 at gmail dot

[Bug libfortran/50016] The fortran program 's io is very slow

2011-08-08 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50016 --- Comment #7 from PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-08-08 12:05:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) Maybe this is MingW specific? I haven't tested this, but here goes my guess: Since in the write loop we're jumping back and forth

[Bug libfortran/50016] The fortran program 's io is very slow

2011-08-08 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50016 --- Comment #8 from PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-08-08 12:35:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) (In reply to comment #6) Maybe this is MingW specific? I haven't tested this, but here goes my guess: Since in the write loop

[Bug libfortran/50016] The fortran program 's io is very slow

2011-08-08 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50016 --- Comment #9 from PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-08-08 12:38:11 UTC --- CC list add Kai.

[Bug libfortran/50016] The fortran program 's io is very slow

2011-08-08 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50016 PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.7.0 --- Comment #10

[Bug libfortran/50016] New: The fortran program 's io is very slow

2011-08-07 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50016 Summary: The fortran program 's io is very slow Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfortran AssignedTo:

[Bug libfortran/50016] The fortran program 's io is very slow

2011-08-07 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50016 --- Comment #1 from PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-08-07 17:14:10 UTC --- Created attachment 24942 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24942 test program

[Bug libfortran/50016] The fortran program 's io is very slow

2011-08-07 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50016 PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xunxun1982 at gmail dot

[Bug libfortran/50016] The fortran program 's io is very slow

2011-08-07 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50016 --- Comment #4 from PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-08-07 23:22:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) I can not reproduce this on my system. I did notice a warning about line truncation on the long line in the example. You may want to use

[Bug libfortran/50016] The fortran program 's io is very slow

2011-08-07 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50016 --- Comment #5 from PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-08-07 23:24:46 UTC --- Created attachment 24946 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24946 fixed test

[Bug lto/49922] I try to build libgmp using PGO and lto, but the test will result in internal compiler error

2011-08-03 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49922 --- Comment #1 from PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-08-03 14:00:26 UTC --- Change to lto component

[Bug gcov-profile/49922] New: I try to build libgmp using PGO and lto, but the test will result in internal compiler error

2011-07-31 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49922 Summary: I try to build libgmp using PGO and lto, but the test will result in internal compiler error Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/49844] Building CodeBlocks on Windows using mingw gcc 4.6.1 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin results in many linker stage errors

2011-07-27 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49844 --- Comment #3 from PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-07-27 17:22:39 UTC --- I found that if I add the option -flto-partition=none, the problem will disappear

[Bug lto/49844] Building CodeBlocks on Windows using mingw gcc 4.6.1 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin results in many linker stage errors

2011-07-26 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49844 --- Comment #2 from PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-07-26 09:32:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) It sounds like a linker bug. Please try without fancy linker options like --as-needed. I remove -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--as-needed

[Bug lto/49844] New: Building CodeBlocks on Windows using mingw gcc 4.6.1 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin results in many linker stage errors

2011-07-25 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49844 Summary: Building CodeBlocks on Windows using mingw gcc 4.6.1 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin results in many linker stage errors Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status:

[Bug libgomp/42616] OMP'ed loop inside pthread leads to crash.

2011-07-10 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42616 PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xunxun1982 at gmail dot

[Bug c++/43601] Enormous increase in DLL object files size in 4.5

2011-06-08 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601 --- Comment #64 from PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-06-08 14:26:05 UTC --- I found that the shared or static gcc edition made a great difference of the wx unicode release mono dll size. - At first, I build

[Bug c++/43601] Enormous increase in DLL object files size in 4.5

2011-04-20 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601 --- Comment #62 from PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-04-21 01:28:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #61) (In reply to comment #59) I review the patch, and found that we can add -fno-keep-inline-dllexport to the compiler option

[Bug c++/43601] Enormous increase in DLL object files size in 4.5

2011-04-17 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601 --- Comment #59 from PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-04-17 11:06:13 UTC --- Yea, I review the patch(In reply to comment #57) (In reply to comment #56) What works for me on Cygwin, and so may well also work for anyone using MSYS

[Bug tree-optimization/48172] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] incorrect vectorization of loop in GCC 4.5.* with -O3

2011-04-07 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48172 PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xunxun1982 at gmail dot

[Bug c++/43601] Enormous increase in DLL object files size in 4.5

2011-03-16 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601 --- Comment #54 from PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-03-16 06:53:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #53) If I don't use LTO Optimization, Vadim Zeitlin's patch works well. But if I use LTO Optimization, the compiling speed becomes vey slow

[Bug c++/43601] Enormous increase in DLL object files size in 4.5

2011-03-15 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601 PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xunxun1982 at gmail dot

[Bug lto/45343] LTO doesn't work with Boost on MinGW

2010-10-14 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45343 xunxun1982 xunxun1982 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xunxun1982