http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43062
--- Comment #28 from Xavier 2011-01-29 21:47:19 UTC
---
I tried again to build gcc 4.6 (from svn) and i succeeded. The patch works
fine.
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43062
--- Comment #26 from Xavier 2011-01-28 09:11:27 UTC
---
Thanks for your work.
Question : I tried to build my own version, but i did not succeed.
(1) gcc-4.5.2 : ok
(2) gcc-4.5.2 + modified/added files from trunk (4.6) : compilation error on
fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43062
--- Comment #20 from Xavier 2011-01-18 13:14:38 UTC
---
Hi,
so, I am bit lost, "bug" is resolved or not ?
Correction available with next version of gcc ?
Thanks,
Xavier
--- Comment #4 from zazzou at gmail dot com 2010-02-15 08:17 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I've posted a question to c.l.f about this code. I
> believe the language of the standard is contradictory
> and as such the code can be interpreted as illegal or
>
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: zazzou at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43062
