http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48743
--- Comment #3 from Zuxy zuxy.meng at gmail dot com 2011-05-12 08:27:56 UTC
---
Created attachment 24233
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24233
Proposed patch
For a brief time AMD produced K6-2+ and K6-3+ processors, targeting
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48227
--- Comment #3 from Zuxy zuxy.meng at gmail dot com 2011-04-06 13:42:21 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #1)
A good question is does it make a difference in actual performance numbers, it
might still make a positive difference. Until someone tries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48227
Summary: rep ret generated for -march=core2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo:
