[Bug ada/22301] [4.1 Regression] Ada does not build into a clean prefix when unwind.h is not installed

2005-07-07 Thread charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-07 09:55 --- Fixed. Thanks to all for your feedbacks. Arno -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug ada/22301] [4.1 Regression] Ada does not build into a clean prefix when unwind.h is not installed

2005-07-07 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-07 09:46 --- Subject: Bug 22301 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-07 09:46:31 Modified files: gcc/ada: raise.c Log message: 2005-0

[Bug ada/22301] [4.1 Regression] Ada does not build into a clean prefix when unwind.h is not installed

2005-07-06 Thread hainque at adacore dot com
--- Additional Comments From hainque at adacore dot com 2005-07-06 14:50 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Ada does not build into a clean prefix when unwind.h is not installed Olivier Hainque wrote: > I'll test on our internal suite and followup. Went fine on x86-linux, committing

[Bug ada/22301] [4.1 Regression] Ada does not build into a clean prefix when unwind.h is not installed

2005-07-06 Thread hainque at adacore dot com
--- Additional Comments From hainque at adacore dot com 2005-07-06 13:30 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Ada does not build into a clean prefix when unwind.h is not installed pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > This patch fixed the problem I was having, thanks. :) Thanks for t

[Bug ada/22301] [4.1 Regression] Ada does not build into a clean prefix when unwind.h is not installed

2005-07-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-06 13:27 --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #8) > > Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Ada does not build into a clean prefix when > > unwind.h is not installed > I will try this patch later tonight after

[Bug ada/22301] [4.1 Regression] Ada does not build into a clean prefix when unwind.h is not installed

2005-07-05 Thread charlet at adacore dot com
--- Additional Comments From charlet at adacore dot com 2005-07-06 06:06 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Ada does not build into a clean prefix when unwind.h is not installed > Ada is very confused it looks like as raise.c is both a host and target > file which seems to me wrong. A

[Bug ada/22301] [4.1 Regression] Ada does not build into a clean prefix when unwind.h is not installed

2005-07-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-05 22:30 --- (In reply to comment #8) > Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Ada does not build into a clean prefix when > unwind.h is not installed I will try this patch later tonight after testing PR 18692. -- http://gc

[Bug ada/22301] [4.1 Regression] Ada does not build into a clean prefix when unwind.h is not installed

2005-07-05 Thread pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-07-05 17:37 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Ada does not build into a clean prefix when unwind.h is not installed On Jul 5, 2005, at 10:19 AM, pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > The other alternative is ada is

Re: [Bug ada/22301] [4.1 Regression] Ada does not build into a clean prefix when unwind.h is not installed

2005-07-05 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Jul 5, 2005, at 10:19 AM, pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: The other alternative is ada is very confused about host vs. target, and raise.c shouldn't be in the compiler at all. Ada is very confused it looks like as raise.c is both a host and target file which seems to me wrong. --

[Bug ada/22301] [4.1 Regression] Ada does not build into a clean prefix when unwind.h is not installed

2005-07-05 Thread pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-05 14:19 --- In that case this may be a darwin bug. IIUC gnat1 uses exceptions, and needs the host unwind.h to do so. These exceptions may be different to the exceptions on the target system. If darwin doesn't have this

[Bug ada/22301] [4.1 Regression] Ada does not build into a clean prefix when unwind.h is not installed

2005-07-05 Thread hainque at adacore dot com
--- Additional Comments From hainque at adacore dot com 2005-07-05 14:08 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Ada does not build into a clean prefix when unwind.h is not installed charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Hmm, so it means that there is no way for a compiler front-end to us

[Bug ada/22301] [4.1 Regression] Ada does not build into a clean prefix when unwind.h is not installed

2005-07-05 Thread charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-05 12:26 --- Hmm, so it means that there is no way for a compiler front-end to use GCC's exception handling mechanism ? I would guess adding a #if IN_RTS around the unwind.h include would probably solve this issue: #if

[Bug ada/22301] [4.1 Regression] Ada does not build into a clean prefix when unwind.h is not installed

2005-07-05 Thread pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-05 12:10 --- unwind.h is a target header. It should not be included by host code (ie. the compiler). -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug ada/22301] [4.1 Regression] Ada does not build into a clean prefix when unwind.h is not installed

2005-07-05 Thread charlet at adacore dot com
--- Additional Comments From charlet at adacore dot com 2005-07-05 07:11 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Ada does not build into a clean prefix when unwind.h is not installed I got the same issue on i686-linux, so this is affecting several targets apparently. Arno -- http://gc

[Bug ada/22301] [4.1 Regression] Ada does not build into a clean prefix when unwind.h is not installed

2005-07-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-05 01:42 --- I should mention that raise.c is a part of compiling gnat1, the compiler, maybe it should not be including that header. -- What|Removed |Added -