http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24167
--- Comment #5 from simon at pushface dot org 2011-09-16 17:27:27 UTC ---
Fixed in 4.6.0.
Am I allowed/able to mark this RESOLVED?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24167
Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #4 from simon at pushface dot org 2010-01-07 17:34 ---
Still there with gcc version 4.5.0 20100104 (experimental) (GCC) (r155633)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24167
--- Comment #3 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-01-02 15:17 ---
Still there with 4.3.2 and
gcc version 4.4.0 20081228 (experimental) [trunk revision 142939] (GCC)
Arnaud, do you have a generic expert handy to check wether this code is legal
or not? generic compiling but not an
--- Comment #1 from simon at pushface dot org 2005-10-02 17:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=9861)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9861action=view)
Demonstration of problem
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24167
--- Comment #2 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-02 17:52 ---
Same message on mainline, however I'm not able to say wether it's a bug or not.
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
