There were 191 tests which failed to build.  There were 190 lines with 
stor-layout.c:258 on them.  So this error is responsible for almost all 
of the ACATS build failures on bfin.

bfin-rtems4.9-gcc -c -fstack-check -O -gnatws -O2
-I/home/joel/work-gnat/svn/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/work-eZKit533/support
a87b59a.adb

I tried this at various optimization levels and it doesn't matter.

+===========================GNAT BUG DETECTED==============================+
| 4.4.0 20080722 (experimental) [trunk revision 138063] (bfin-unknown-rtems4.9)
GCC error:|
| in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:258                               |
| Error detected around a87b59a.adb:33                                     |
| Please submit a bug report; see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html.            |
| Use a subject line meaningful to you and us to track the bug.            |
| Include the entire contents of this bug box in the report.               |
| Include the exact gcc or gnatmake command that you entered.              |
| Also include sources listed below in gnatchop format                     |
| (concatenated together with no headers between files).                   |
+==========================================================================+

Please include these source files with error report
Note that list may not be accurate in some cases,
so please double check that the problem can still
be reproduced with the set of files listed.

a87b59a.adb
/home/joel/work-gnat/svn/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/work-eZKit533/support/report.ads


raised TYPES.UNRECOVERABLE_ERROR : comperr.adb:424
End of compilation


-- 
           Summary: Compiler error on many ACATS tests on bfin target
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.4.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: ada
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: joel at gcc dot gnu dot org
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: bfin-rtems4.9


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36940

Reply via email to