https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37620
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
--- Comment #4 from sam at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-23 11:32 ---
I don't agree with your reasoning: X is not referenced. The fact that it has a
constructor should not change anything. For example, access types are
initialized to Null as well, so you could count that as a reference.
Y
--- Comment #3 from esigra at gmail dot com 2008-09-23 10:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=16392)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16392&action=view)
Makefile
--
esigra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #2 from esigra at gmail dot com 2008-09-23 10:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=16391)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16391&action=view)
implementation
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37620
--- Comment #1 from esigra at gmail dot com 2008-09-23 10:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=16390)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16390&action=view)
Makefile
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37620
