https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41854
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
--- Comment #1 from rogermc at iinet dot net dot au 2009-10-28 07:15
---
Created an attachment (id=18922)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18922action=view)
Types.ads
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41854
--- Comment #2 from rogermc at iinet dot net dot au 2009-10-28 07:16
---
Created an attachment (id=18923)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18923action=view)
tools.ads
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41854
--- Comment #3 from rogermc at iinet dot net dot au 2009-10-28 07:23
---
Created an attachment (id=18924)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18924action=view)
tools.adb
The bug report occurred when I changed
basisData : tBasisData(Positive 1..2);
to:
basisData :
--- Comment #4 from rogermc at iinet dot net dot au 2009-10-28 07:27
---
Bug is repeatable.
Syntax check works OK.
--
rogermc at iinet dot net dot au changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from rogermc at iinet dot net dot au 2009-10-28 07:39
---
Of course, correct declaration is bug free:
basisData : tBasisData(2);
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41854
