http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52362
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52362
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou 2012-05-25
10:07:27 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri May 25 10:07:23 2012
New Revision: 187877
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187877
Log:
PR ada/52362
* config.gcc (i[34567]86-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52362
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou 2012-05-25
09:24:12 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri May 25 09:24:08 2012
New Revision: 187874
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187874
Log:
PR ada/52362
* config.gcc (i[34567]86-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52362
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-14
11:22:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> When there are many files to link, gnatlink passes a file containing the file
> names, instead of the file names directly, on the GCC link line. There is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52362
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2012-05-14
11:14:28 UTC ---
When there are many files to link, gnatlink passes a file containing the file
names, instead of the file names directly, on the GCC link line. There is a
bad interaction with LTO:
er
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52362
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|*-*-solaris2*, |
|x86_64-unknown-linux-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52362
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14 21:28:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> > After that, I tested an tail-merge (AFAIK unrelated) patch on top of the
> > same
> > sources, and now the test fails for both:
>
> With exactly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52362
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2012-03-14
21:10:38 UTC ---
> After that, I tested an tail-merge (AFAIK unrelated) patch on top of the same
> sources, and now the test fails for both:
With exactly the same invocation of make -k check, in parti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52362
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-14 21:02:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> What's different with --disable-bootstrap? Missing linker plugin support?
I did a reference build, bootstrap and nobootstrap, and the test passed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52362
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52362
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
11 matches
Mail list logo
