http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53590
--- Comment #4 from Georg 2012-06-11 10:31:00
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > > Other versions of the Ada compiler, and the C compiler,
> > > and the C++ compiler of the same version produce
> > > 1 DIVPD instructi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53590
--- Comment #3 from Georg 2012-06-11 10:09:18
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> > Other versions of the Ada compiler, and the C compiler,
> > and the C++ compiler of the same version produce
> > 1 DIVPD instruction, as expected.
>
> Which other
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53590
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53590
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53590
--- Comment #1 from Georg Bauhaus 2012-06-06
13:29:36 UTC ---
For comparison, consider this, giving expected results (1 DIVPD).
-- 8< --
typedef double fpt;
typedef fpt Vec[2];
struct ArrayWrap {
Vec _;
};
struct ArrayWrap f (fpt x0, fpt x
