[Bug analyzer/110198] [14 regression] g++.dg/analyzer/pr100244.C fails after r14-1632-g9589a46ddadc8b

2023-06-29 Thread vultkayn at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110198 Benjamin Priour changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug analyzer/110198] [14 regression] g++.dg/analyzer/pr100244.C fails after r14-1632-g9589a46ddadc8b

2023-06-29 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110198 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Benjamin Priour : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1eb90f46c16453f72dc119ba20b07053a15b452d commit r14-2203-g1eb90f46c16453f72dc119ba20b07053a15b452d Author: benjamin priour Date:

[Bug analyzer/110198] [14 regression] g++.dg/analyzer/pr100244.C fails after r14-1632-g9589a46ddadc8b

2023-06-22 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110198 --- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to Benjamin Priour from comment #4) > Yes, has been fixed and regtested a week ago. However I was in vacation > last week. > I will submit it shortly. though I would prefer to perform another

[Bug analyzer/110198] [14 regression] g++.dg/analyzer/pr100244.C fails after r14-1632-g9589a46ddadc8b

2023-06-20 Thread priour.be at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110198 --- Comment #4 from Benjamin Priour --- Yes, has been fixed and regtested a week ago. However I was in vacation last week. I will submit it shortly. though I would prefer to perform another regtesting on a freshly pulled trunk first. Benjamin.

[Bug analyzer/110198] [14 regression] g++.dg/analyzer/pr100244.C fails after r14-1632-g9589a46ddadc8b

2023-06-20 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110198 --- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to Benjamin Priour from comment #2) > Yes sorry for the regression. I confirmed it myself too on x86_64-linux-gnu. > I wrote a fix immediately yesterday, and I am currently regtesting it. >

[Bug analyzer/110198] [14 regression] g++.dg/analyzer/pr100244.C fails after r14-1632-g9589a46ddadc8b

2023-06-09 Thread vultkayn at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110198 --- Comment #2 from Benjamin Priour --- Yes sorry for the regression. I confirmed it myself too on x86_64-linux-gnu. I wrote a fix immediately yesterday, and I am currently regtesting it. It is promising as I quickly ran the test only for the