https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112655

            Bug ID: 112655
           Summary: analyzer/infinite-loop.cc:75: Possible performance
                    problem ?
           Product: gcc
           Version: 14.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: analyzer
          Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Static analyser cppcheck finds this problem:

analyzer/infinite-loop.cc:75:38: performance: Function parameter 'eedges'
should be passed by const reference. [passedByValue]

Source code is

struct infinite_loop
{
  infinite_loop (const exploded_node &enode,
        location_t loc,
        std::vector<const exploded_edge *> eedges,
        logger *logger)

Some other potential problems found by cppcheck for the analyzer:

trunk.year/gcc/analyzer/sm-file.cc:282:3: performance: Variable 'm_unchecked'
is assigned in constructor body. Consider performing initialization in
initialization list. [useInitializationList]
trunk.year/gcc/analyzer/sm-sensitive.cc:170:3: performance: Variable
'm_sensitive' is assigned in constructor body. Consider performing
initialization in initialization list. [useInitializationList]
trunk.year/gcc/analyzer/sm-signal.cc:190:3: performance: Variable
'm_in_signal_handler' is assigned in constructor body. Consider performing
initialization in initialization list. [useInitializationList]
trunk.year/gcc/analyzer/sm-taint.cc:869:3: performance: Variable 'm_tainted' is
assigned in constructor body. Consider performing initialization in
initialization list. [useInitializationList]
trunk.year/gcc/analyzer/region-model.cc:6976:5: performance: Variable
'm_x_field' is assigned in constructor body. Consider performing initialization
in initialization list. [useInitializationList]
trunk.year/gcc/analyzer/varargs.cc:247:3: performance: Variable 'm_started' is
assigned in constructor body. Consider performing initialization in
initialization list. [useInitializationList]

Reply via email to