https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93544
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d66e153b40ed000af30a9e569a05f34d5d576aa
commit r10-7023-g3d66e153b40ed000af30a9e569a05f34d5d576aa
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93544
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:71b633aaea3aac2d983da7b1b99da8c9a8c80d1a
commit r10-6880-g71b633aaea3aac2d983da7b1b99da8c9a8c80d1a
Author: David Malcolm
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93544
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93544
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8525d1f5f57b11fe04a97674cc2fc2b7727621d0
commit r10-6412-g8525d1f5f57b11fe04a97674cc2fc2b7727621d0
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93544
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #3)
[...]
> I'm not sure either now. I bet I've seen
>
> | 11 | bs = dx = !!ja ? qd () : 0;
> | |~~^~~
> | |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93544
--- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #2)
> (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #0)
> > (BTW, w/o -O1 the analysis seems to be wrong in that double-free happens
> > following "false" branch, but that'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93544
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #0)
[...snip...]
Thanks for filing this, I'm investigating the ICE.
> (BTW, w/o -O1 the analysis seems to be wrong in that double-free happens
> following "false" br
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93544
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
