[Bug analyzer/98969] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in print_mem_ref)

2021-02-17 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98969 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug analyzer/98969] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in print_mem_ref)

2021-02-17 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98969 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e0139b2a912585496f23c352f0e2c56895f78fbf commit r11-7270-ge0139b2a912585496f23c352f0e2c56895f78fbf Author: David Malcolm Date: W

[Bug analyzer/98969] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in print_mem_ref)

2021-02-11 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98969 --- Comment #11 from David Malcolm --- As noted above, the ICE is fixed, but the leak false positive is not yet fixed.

[Bug analyzer/98969] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in print_mem_ref)

2021-02-11 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98969 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:467a48205279cab368dbeb02879e4b721516 commit r11-7202-g467a48205279cab368dbeb02879e4b721516 Author: David Malcolm Date: T

[Bug analyzer/98969] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in print_mem_ref)

2021-02-10 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98969 --- Comment #9 from David Malcolm --- *** Bug 99064 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug analyzer/98969] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in print_mem_ref)

2021-02-06 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98969 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor --- For reference, this is the change I used to test the MEM_REF formatting: diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-uninit.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-uninit.c index 0800f596ab1..0f47c0c286d 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-uninit.c +++ b/gcc/

[Bug analyzer/98969] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in print_mem_ref)

2021-02-06 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98969 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- I had already dealt with this problem in the pretty printer in r11-6621 (the same way as in comment #2) but it regressed with Jakub's subsequent changes in r11-6729. It's also not the only regression that Jak

[Bug analyzer/98969] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in print_mem_ref)

2021-02-05 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98969 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug analyzer/98969] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in print_mem_ref)

2021-02-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98969 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Yeah, seems the analyzer looked through the cast, so either it shouldn't, or it needs to readd the cast in there. As for print_mem_ref, if we wanted to protect it from bogus MEM_REF creation (not sure about

[Bug analyzer/98969] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in print_mem_ref)

2021-02-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98969 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org Co