https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111021
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] Serial |[14 Regression] Serial
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111021
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8353b9c5f5af0e65cb04fcbb7325d6a566006cd4
commit r14-3322-g8353b9c5f5af0e65cb04fcbb7325d6a566006cd4
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Fri Aug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111021
--- Comment #17 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12)
> I think a "too broad" dependence isn't bad. The cris specific solution also
> looks manageable, though I wonder what's special about x-protos.h,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111021
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Hans-Peter Nilsson :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eef192b181b8777d708671e2541896e7e31293aa
commit r14-3218-geef192b181b8777d708671e2541896e7e31293aa
Author: Hans-Peter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111021
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111021
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ecb95399f43873e1f34119ac260bbea2ef358e53
commit r14-3215-gecb95399f43873e1f34119ac260bbea2ef358e53
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Tue Aug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111021
--- Comment #14 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #13)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12)
> > I think a "too broad" dependence isn't bad. The cris specific solution also
> > looks manageable, though I wonder
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111021
--- Comment #13 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12)
> I think a "too broad" dependence isn't bad. The cris specific solution also
> looks manageable, though I wonder what's special about x-protos.h, knowing
> very
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111021
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
I think a "too broad" dependence isn't bad. The cris specific solution also
looks manageable, though I wonder what's special about x-protos.h, knowing very
little of that area.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111021
--- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #8)
> I might have misunderstood things of course,
...like still having to include tree.h to get the code_helper class definition.
Doh!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111021
--- Comment #10 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #7)
> Exactly; I'm happy that we seem to be on the same page here.
>
> I'm testing a patch for CRIS (making the hook function just a wrapper,
> reverting the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111021
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/627444.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111021
--- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #6)
>
> btw, thanks for the suggestion on "defaulting to NULL or something" in ML,
> but I guess a default value like zero rather than ERROR_MARK has to base on
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111021
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #6)
> (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #5)
> [...]
> but the concern is that one day some file just includes tm_p.h but
> not recog.h, the issue will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111021
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111021
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #4)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/627435.html
>
> Nope, that just fixes recog.h.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111021
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/627435.html
Nope, that just fixes recog.h. See the quoted error; it's the patched
*-protos.h.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111021
--- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #2)
> Thanks for reporting, I think the culprit is r14-3093 instead of r14-3092?
Not for this PR!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111021
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111021
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/627435.html
20 matches
Mail list logo