[Bug bootstrap/25502] I64d format Werror problem in build

--- Comment #21 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-13 10:39 --- Fix on trunk on revision 141087. See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-10/msg00428.html for the patch. -- ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug bootstrap/25502] I64d format Werror problem in build

--- Comment #20 from aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com 2008-09-14 03:27 --- Danny has recommended that we wait until 4.5 to add -Wno-pedantic-ms-format which will resolve this problem. . In the meantime, I'll keep the patch at

[Bug bootstrap/25502] I64d format Werror problem in build

--- Comment #19 from aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com 2008-08-24 01:17 --- Kai, I'm assigning this to you because you said on IRC a month or two ago that you were working on a patch for this. I've been working around this with a local patch that adds __extension__ everywhere that needs i

[Bug bootstrap/25502] I64d format Werror problem in build

--- Comment #18 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-19 10:27 --- The problem here is not that the ms-formatter patch can't treat I/I32/I64. The problem is, that the ms-extensions are treated as gnu-extensions, which is in my option wrong. The scalar width specifiers should be trea

[Bug bootstrap/25502] I64d format Werror problem in build

--- Comment #17 from aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com 2008-05-11 21:24 --- (In reply to comment #16) > -Wno-long-long disables warnings in gnu89 -pedantic mode for certain > standard C99 usages, not for non-standard usages. You could add > -Wno-long-long-windows-formats to disable warn

[Bug bootstrap/25502] I64d format Werror problem in build

--- Comment #16 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-05-11 12:17 --- Subject: Re: I64d format Werror problem in build On Sun, 11 May 2008, aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com wrote: > Another question: why does "lld" not cause warnings on linux here? I don't > see > what the differe

[Bug bootstrap/25502] I64d format Werror problem in build

--- Comment #15 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-05-11 12:15 --- Subject: Re: Werror problem in build On Sun, 11 May 2008, aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com wrote: > --- Comment #13 from aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com 2008-05-11 03:04 > --- > What would be an acceptabl

[Bug bootstrap/25502] I64d format Werror problem in build

--- Comment #14 from aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com 2008-05-11 04:48 --- Another question: why does "lld" not cause warnings on linux here? I don't see what the difference is. Whatever the situation is, I don't see any reason that "I64d" should behave differently from "lld" in gnu89 m