--- Comment #7 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-12 16:02 ---
Subject: Bug 28784
Author: sayle
Date: Tue Sep 12 16:02:31 2006
New Revision: 116891
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116891
Log:
PR middle-end/4520
PR bootstrap/28784
*
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-12 17:11 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from roger at eyesopen dot com 2006-09-11 16:52 ---
I believe I have a patch. I'm just waiting for the fix for PR28672 (which I've
just approved) to be applied, so I can complete bootstrap and regression test
to confirm there are no unexpected side-effects.
--
roger
--- Comment #1 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-08-20 09:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=12103)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12103action=view)
Diff of objdump -d output
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28784
--- Comment #2 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-08-20 14:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=12104)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12104action=view)
Diff of compiler dumps
All dumps before mach are identical.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28784
--- Comment #3 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-08-20 14:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=12105)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12105action=view)
stage3 mach dump
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28784
--- Comment #4 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-08-20 15:24 ---
The bug is very sensitive on the environment size. Adding -da makes it go
away, adding -da -da makes it reappear. Looks like some decision is made on
the low bits of an address.
--
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 15:39 ---
I really don't think this is a regression, this is most likely related to PR
20586 or PR 28752.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
