--- Comment #7 from sdack at gmx dot de 2007-02-18 22:12 ---
I dug a bit deeper and should now get my gcc compiled with a load full of
options. It is compiling right now. The idea is to get a highly optimized
output as well as to cause high stress to gcc. However, there is a file called
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 22:29 ---
libcpp should be use BOOT_CFLAGS in 4.1.0 and before.
In 4.2.0 and above the toplevel bootstrap allows libcpp to be compiled three
times.
Second there is TARGET_CFLAGS also which is used to compile target libraries.
--- Comment #5 from sdack at gmx dot de 2007-02-16 19:03 ---
What I now did was the following: I set CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS, LIBCFLAGS,
LIBCXXFLAGS and BOOT_CFLAGS on the command line to make to:
"-pipe -march=athlon-xp -msse -mmmx -m3dnow -mfpmath=sse -O3
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=6 -falign
--- Comment #4 from sdack at gmx dot de 2007-02-16 13:18 ---
Subject: Re: top-level BOOT_CFLAGS not being used for
bootstrapping
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org schrieb:
> --- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 01:48
> ---
>> I believe this is due to BO
--- Comment #3 from sdack at gmx dot de 2007-02-16 13:17 ---
Subject: Re: top-level BOOT_CFLAGS not being used for
bootstrapping
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org schrieb:
> --- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 21:28
> ---
> You mentioned BOOT_STRAP in
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 01:48 ---
>I believe this is due to BOOT_CFLAGS missing in the top-level's Makefile lists
They are passed down, see EXTRA_GCC_FLAGS.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 21:28 ---
You mentioned BOOT_STRAP in your comment is that correct?
Also did you use "make bootstrap" and not just a plain make?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30810