[Bug bootstrap/35169] SIGSEGV for stack growth failure while building 4.2.3

2008-05-02 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-02 09:19 --- *** Bug 27794 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/35169] SIGSEGV for stack growth failure while building 4.2.3

2008-05-01 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-02 04:09 --- Subject: Bug 35169 Author: rwild Date: Fri May 2 04:08:11 2008 New Revision: 134880 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=134880 Log: gcc/ PR bootstrap/35169 * optc-gen.awk: Work

[Bug bootstrap/35169] SIGSEGV for stack growth failure while building 4.2.3

2008-05-01 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-02 04:16 --- Subject: Bug 35169 Author: rwild Date: Fri May 2 04:15:36 2008 New Revision: 134881 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=134881 Log: gcc/ PR bootstrap/35169 * optc-gen.awk: Work

[Bug bootstrap/35169] SIGSEGV for stack growth failure while building 4.2.3

2008-05-01 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-02 04:30 --- Fixed. -- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/35169] SIGSEGV for stack growth failure while building 4.2.3

2008-04-28 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-28 22:28 --- Subject: Bug 35169 Author: rwild Date: Mon Apr 28 22:27:22 2008 New Revision: 134768 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=134768 Log: gcc/ PR bootstrap/35169 * optc-gen.awk: Work

[Bug bootstrap/35169] SIGSEGV for stack growth failure while building 4.2.3

2008-04-17 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-04-17 15:09 --- same as PR27794? http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27794 confirmed, gcc 4.2.2 hp ia64 11.23 Possible causes: insufficient memory or swap space, or stack size exceeded maxssiz. make[4]: ***

[Bug bootstrap/35169] SIGSEGV for stack growth failure while building 4.2.3

2008-03-31 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot

[Bug bootstrap/35169] SIGSEGV for stack growth failure while building 4.2.3

2008-03-31 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-31 21:19 --- patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-03/msg02037.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35169

[Bug bootstrap/35169] SIGSEGV for stack growth failure while building 4.2.3

2008-03-28 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Comment #3 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2008-03-28 20:58 --- (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) ld is running at this time so I doubt this is a GCC bug. The Pid it is referring to (Pid 18929 received a SIGSEGV for stack growth failure.) is

[Bug bootstrap/35169] SIGSEGV for stack growth failure while building 4.2.3

2008-03-28 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Comment #4 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2008-03-29 02:21 --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) ld is running at this time so I doubt this is a GCC bug. The Pid it is referring to (Pid 18929 received a SIGSEGV for

[Bug bootstrap/35169] SIGSEGV for stack growth failure while building 4.2.3

2008-02-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-12 01:36 --- ld is running at this time so I doubt this is a GCC bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35169

[Bug bootstrap/35169] SIGSEGV for stack growth failure while building 4.2.3

2008-02-11 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Comment #2 from bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2008-02-12 03:52 --- (In reply to comment #1) ld is running at this time so I doubt this is a GCC bug. The Pid it is referring to (Pid 18929 received a SIGSEGV for stack growth failure.) is