http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37122
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Richard G. skunk at iskunk dot org 2012-05-11
19:16:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 27383
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27383
updated patch for 4.7.0
I got bitten by this recently. Bootstrapping GCC
--- Comment #5 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-12 07:06 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Yes, your right it is a bug in Sun's Compiler. For those interested it is bug
ID: 6406892. The sun patch that fixes this bug is 121015-06 available here:
--- Comment #4 from davediff at nbcs dot rutgers dot edu 2008-09-03 13:28
---
Yes, your right it is a bug in Sun's Compiler. For those interested it is bug
ID: 6406892. The sun patch that fixes this bug is 121015-06 available here:
http://sunsolve.sun.com/show.do?target=patchpage
--
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-16 22:47 ---
This seems like a bug in Sun's compiler. As far as I can tell a ? const struct
A : struct A should be valid in C and C++. I think you should both post the
patches to gcc-patches@ and make sure you file a bug with
--- Comment #1 from davediff at nbcs dot rutgers dot edu 2008-08-14 15:54
---
Created an attachment (id=16072)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16072action=view)
patch to fix fixed-value.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37122
--- Comment #2 from davediff at nbcs dot rutgers dot edu 2008-08-14 15:55
---
Created an attachment (id=16073)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16073action=view)
patch to fix tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37122