--- Comment #4 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-17 15:33 ---
The ln invocation has long since been using -f, so i'm closing this old bug
fixed.
--
davek at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #3 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2008-09-27 17:38 ---
If I build from scratch with a svn update I get bug 37660.
If I then build again I get 37655, so probably this bug is not important and
just
fixed by adding -f to ln as Brian says.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #2 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2008-09-27 05:26 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Subject: Re: New: Error Building libgcc_s.dll
>
> The fact that the symlink already exists implies that the command failed
> before and this is the result of running it again. What is the
--- Comment #1 from brian at dessent dot net 2008-09-27 00:14 ---
Subject: Re: New: Error Building libgcc_s.dll
The fact that the symlink already exists implies that the command failed
before and this is the result of running it again. What is the actual
error when you remove the sym
