--- Comment #6 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-15 03:29 ---
Using --with-libelf should work (I just checked it on several systems). Please
re-open this report if your problems persist.
--
bje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #5 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-09 05:09 ---
Building with --with-libelf is the right approach. I don't think it works 100%
correctly, though, so I will take this bug and investigate.
--
bje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-03-10 04:22 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Dismal Testsuite results are here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-02/msg02284.html
Rob
Great results are here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-02/msg02375.html
--
--- Comment #3 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-02-23 14:52 ---
Dismal Testsuite results are here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-02/msg02284.html
Rob
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39019
--- Comment #1 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-02-23 01:21 ---
Confirmed on i386-pc-solaris2.11 (OpenSolaris 2009.06).
We are advised to use libelf v0.8.10, which (by default) installs in
/usr/local but the lto configury uses /usr/include/libelf.h .
+1 for --with-libelf=/usr/local .
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-02-23 03:51 ---
Rainer, while we wait for the patch did you wish to try this:
1. Edit the gcc/configure (Line 9562) and reverse the detection order:
- for ac_header in gelf.h libelf/gelf.h
+ for ac_header in libelf/gelf.h gelf.h
2.
