https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39849
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39849
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
--- Comment #20 from dennis dot wassel at googlemail dot com 2009-08-17
12:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=18382)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18382&action=view)
Preprocessed source (of trunk revision 150835)
--
dennis dot wassel at googlemail dot com changed
--- Comment #19 from dennis dot wassel at googlemail dot com 2009-08-17
12:07 ---
Also fails for trunk revision 150835 with what looks to me like exactly the
same error:
GNU gdb 6.4.90-debian
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU Gen
--- Comment #18 from dennis dot wassel at googlemail dot com 2009-07-27
12:40 ---
It still happens in 4.4.1:
/localdata/install/gcc/objdir-gcc-4.4.1/./gcc/xgcc
-B/localdata/install/gcc/objdir-gcc-4.4.1/./gcc/
-B/localdata/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/localdata/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/
-isys
--- Comment #17 from dennis dot wassel at googlemail dot com 2009-06-08
14:28 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> with Günther's last status report [...]
Now that's just stupid - sorry Richard!
(German mistake)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39849
--- Comment #16 from dennis dot wassel at googlemail dot com 2009-06-08
14:26 ---
Hi,
with Günther's last status report (2009-05-21) saying that there might be a
release in late June, is there any chance that this can be fixed till 4.4.1?
Thanks,
Dennis
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugz
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-04 15:00
---
Yes slightly, it is trying to warn about something which is unitialized. This
works for me on i686-linux-gnu. Can you provide the preprocessed source?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
Wh
--- Comment #15 from dennis dot wassel at googlemail dot com 2009-05-04
15:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=17796)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17796&action=view)
Preprocessed source
Sure!
Attaching preprocessed source of gcc-4.4.0/gcc/config/soft-fp/divtf3.c
-
--- Comment #12 from dennis dot wassel at googlemail dot com 2009-05-04
14:43 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> It obviously works for me, you system seems to be messed up / special.
Seems so, although it is a Debian 4 with an unknown amount of modifications by
our admin.
One symptom of
--- Comment #13 from dennis dot wassel at googlemail dot com 2009-05-04
14:55 ---
I just noticed/remembered that [x]gcc only drives the compilers, so I plugged
cc1 into gdb and here is the (somewhat messy, slightly edited) result:
gdb /localdata/install/gcc/gcc-4.4.0-build/./gcc/cc1
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #11 from dennis dot wassel at googlemail dot com 2009-05-04
14:35 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Do not set CFLAGS in
>
> make CFLAGS='-O2' LIBCFLAGS='-g -O2' LIBCXXFLAGS='-g -O2
> -fno-implicit-templates' profiledbootstrap
This ^ was only in my first iteration, and I've o
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-04 14:29
---
It obviously works for me, you system seems to be messed up / special.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from dennis dot wassel at googlemail dot com 2009-04-28
09:53 ---
Neither `make bootstrap' nor `make all' produce different results.
Btw: isn't `make' (which I tried earlier) equivalent to `make bootstrap'?
Back to square 1.
--
dennis dot wassel at googlemail dot com
15 matches
Mail list logo
