http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #23 from Hin-Tak Leung
2012-05-08 20:48:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> > --- Comment #21 from Hin-Tak Leung
> > 2012-05-08 14:15:52 UTC ---
>
> I think there was a misunderstanding: I specificially asked for the
> smallest
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #22 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-05-08 15:36:03 UTC ---
> --- Comment #21 from Hin-Tak Leung
> 2012-05-08 14:15:52 UTC ---
I think there was a misunderstanding: I specificially asked for the
smallest of the differing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #21 from Hin-Tak Leung
2012-05-08 14:15:52 UTC ---
There are two curious things:
1. why does the 2nd stage drops to only about 600 byte. (I assume 20-30k is
normal).
2. I did have a success with 4.6.1 (and I believe with both make/ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #20 from Hin-Tak Leung
2012-05-08 14:08:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 27348
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27348
3rd set of those checksum files. tar.gz'ed
This one is from 4.6.2 (the other two from 4.6.1), just
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #19 from Hin-Tak Leung
2012-05-08 14:07:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 27347
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27347
another set of those checksum files. tar.gz'ed
I think this one is from make bootstrap4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #18 from Hin-Tak Leung
2012-05-08 14:05:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 27346
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27346
one set of those checksum files. tar.gz'ed
I think this one is from 4.6.1, make bootstrap4-lean
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #17 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-05-07 12:37:37 UTC ---
While the checksum files are expected to differ (thus there are only
warnings about them), the size increase looks really strange: in my
current 4.6.4 build on alp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
Hin-Tak Leung changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.6.3
--- Comment #16 from Hin-Tak Leung
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
Hin-Tak Leung changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
Hin-Tak Leung changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
Hin-Tak Leung changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.1
--- Comment #13 from Hin-Tak Leung
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #12 from Hin-Tak Leung
2011-08-03 15:29:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Did you use an absolute path for the source dir? There have been
> problems with relative paths in the past.
Tried absolute path with 4.6.1, and compilat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-08-02 11:11:00 UTC ---
> Not a subdir - a parallel directory.
>
> source is at /home/htl10/tmp-build/gcc-4.5.1
> obj dir is at /home/htl10/tmp-build/gcc-451-dir
Did you use an absolut
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #10 from Hin-Tak Leung
2011-08-02 11:08:25 UTC ---
> Please try a 4.6.1 tarball and *don't* use relative paths to configure/build
> in
> a subdir of the source tree. I bootstrap gcc (4.5 to 4.7) on Tru64 UNIX all
> the time and neve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
Hin-Tak Leung changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.5.3
--- Comment #8 from Hin-Tak Leung
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
Hin-Tak Leung changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.6.0
--- Comment #7 from Hin-Tak Leung
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.5.3 |4.5.4
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
Hin-Tak Leung changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.5.2
--- Comment #5 from Hin-Tak Leung
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.5.2 |4.5.3
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
Hin-Tak Leung changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.5.0, 4.5.1
--- Comment #3 from Hin-Tak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-31 09:30 ---
GCC 4.5.1 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.5 Regression] bootstrap |[4.5 Regression] bootstrap
|failed at Comparing sta
25 matches
Mail list logo