[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #31 from Anh Vo anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com 2010-12-11 00:54:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #30) (In reply to comment #29) gcc/tm.texi and gcc/tmp3-tm.texi did not have same same line ending. In fact, gcc/tm.texi contains

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #30 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-10 02:04:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #29) gcc/tm.texi and gcc/tmp3-tm.texi did not have same same line ending. In fact, gcc/tm.texi contains 'ASCII English text,

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #29 from Anh Vo anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com 2010-12-07 17:13:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #28) (In reply to comment #27) No, the build still failed the same way. In fact, when issuing command 'file gcc/tm.texi' on the build

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #21 from Anh Vo anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com 2010-12-03 17:45:58 UTC --- Executing command 'file gcc/doc/tm.texi' yields ../gcc-4.6-20101113/gcc/doc/tm.texi: ASCII English text, with CRLF line terminators. However, executing command

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #22 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-03 17:57:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #21) Executing command 'file gcc/doc/tm.texi' yields ../gcc-4.6-20101113/gcc/doc/tm.texi: ASCII English text, with CRLF line

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #23 from Anh Vo anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com 2010-12-03 18:08:27 UTC --- Yes, it is. In fact, I downloaded it from ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6-20101113/. The exact name of the snapshot is gcc-4.6-20101113.tar.bz2.

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #25 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-03 21:35:52 UTC --- Created attachment 22624 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22624 patch to use \r-stripped copy of $(srcdir)/doc/tm.texi for

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #26 from Anh Vo anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com 2010-12-03 22:35:13 UTC --- Rebuilding was just started.

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #27 from Anh Vo anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com 2010-12-03 23:23:49 UTC --- No, the build still failed the same way. In fact, when issuing command 'file gcc/tm.texi' on the build directory, gcc/tm.texi: ASCII English text, with very long

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #28 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-04 01:03:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #27) No, the build still failed the same way. In fact, when issuing command 'file gcc/tm.texi' on the build directory,

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #19 from Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com 2010-12-02 23:38:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #18) (In reply to comment #17) * anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com wrote on Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 01:25:49AM CET: It is interesting

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #20 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-03 00:46:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) Please install the file utility. It should be able to identify if a file has CR or CRLF line terminators. With od, we

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #18 from Anh Vo anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com 2010-11-30 17:00:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) * anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com wrote on Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 01:25:49AM CET: It is interesting that this fix worked for Cesar but

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #16 from Anh Vo anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com 2010-11-30 00:25:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) Author: amylaar Date: Thu Nov 25 08:02:13 2010 New Revision: 167137 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167137

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #17 from Ralf Wildenhues Ralf.Wildenhues at gmx dot de 2010-11-30 06:18:58 UTC --- * anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com wrote on Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 01:25:49AM CET: It is interesting that this fix worked for Cesar but not for me. In fact,

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #15 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-25 08:02:28 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Thu Nov 25 08:02:13 2010 New Revision: 167137 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167137 Log: 2010-11-25

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #14 from Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com 2010-11-24 00:00:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) Created attachment 22400 [details] Proposed patch Does this patch work for you on Cygwin? Dear Jorn, I tried your patch on

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anhvofrcaus at

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #10 from Anh Vo anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com 2010-11-20 00:05:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) Created attachment 22400 [details] Proposed patch Does this patch work for you on Cygwin? It doesn't address MacOS 9 Issues, but

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #11 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-20 00:16:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) case `echo X|tr X '\101'` in \ A) tr -d '\015' tmp-tm.texi tmp2-tm.texi ;; \ *) tr -d '\r'

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #12 from Anh Vo anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com 2010-11-20 01:04:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) (In reply to comment #10) case `echo X|tr X '\101'` in \ A) tr -d '\015' tmp-tm.texi tmp2-tm.texi ;; \ *)

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #13 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-20 01:31:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) (In reply to comment #11) Does the generated tm.texi still have carriage return characters? Or is there some other

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #7 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-15 14:43:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Good point. Let's kill \r then. It should be possible to use tr -d '\015' Do we still have to worry about old

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #8 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-15 15:41:33 UTC --- Created attachment 22400 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22400 Proposed patch Does this patch work for you on Cygwin? It

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #5 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-07 08:03:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) There should always exist a suitable tool on systems where it is needed. FWIW, I would just use the above in the Makefile

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #6 from Ralf Wildenhues Ralf.Wildenhues at gmx dot de 2010-10-07 18:34:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) There should always exist a suitable tool on systems where it is needed. FWIW, I would just use the above in the Makefile

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #4 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-07 04:57:28 UTC --- --- Comment #2 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-05 23:39:37 UTC --- The output produced by genhooks is not portable

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amylaar at gcc dot

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #2 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-05 23:39:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) The thread starting at: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-10/msg00020.html lists a number of issues around tm.texi: The

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-10-05 23:59:16 UTC --- [resending manually to gcc-bugzilla while Bugzilla is broken and sending emails with a header From: address that bounces incoming