http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49787
--- Comment #4 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-20
14:08:44 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jul 20 14:08:42 2011
New Revision: 176512
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176512
Log:
PR bootstrap/49787
* configure.ac: M
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49787
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49787
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49787
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-07-20 01:40:09
UTC ---
Patch posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg01574.html .
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49787
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-20 01:25:55
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Do you think it is more correct to implicitly build C++ when using
> --enable-build-poststage1-with-cxx (which is now the default), or do you think
> it is more co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49787
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
