http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-22 06:49:09
UTC ---
bootstrap regtest completed (r180257 + patch proposed);
fails in struct-layout1 and vmx are gone (all plugins are now failing, but
likely a different reason).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-10-22 13:07:06 UTC ---
Bootstrap completed with the patch here, regtesting in progress. Once the patch
is committed and regress is happy again, please close this pr as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 14:19:40
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Iain, maybe your machine is faster than Dominique's, so maybe you could give
it
a spin?
looks good off a stage3-bubble,
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-10-21 14:25:47 UTC ---
If the patch in comment #10 regstrap on *-linux-*, I think it could be
committed, then monitor regress on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 14:52:54
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
If the patch in comment #10 regstrap on *-linux-*, I think it could be
committed, then monitor regress on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #14 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org
2011-10-21 18:40:41 UTC ---
If the patch in comment #10 regstrap on *-linux-*, I think it could be
committed, then monitor regress on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 18:48:52
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
hm.. got an ICE in stage1 libgcc .. @180302 - but possibly unrelated
/GCC/gcc-live-trunk/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c: In function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #16 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21
19:00:59 UTC ---
Patch proposed to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg02017.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #6 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org
2011-10-20 09:15:31 UTC ---
FWIW, this is maybe related to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50801 that got fixed in
commit r180239
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #7 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org
2011-10-20 09:26:31 UTC ---
I can give you access to my (slowww) G5 if you mail me your ssh key.
Thank you for giving me access to the box.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-20 14:29:12
UTC ---
Unfortunately, as of r180241, I still have the bootstrap fail in building
libgfortran (Java untested) and the ICEs in struct-layout-1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-20 17:44:56
UTC ---
This might be the easier one to debug:
Running /GCC/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp ...
FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t002
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-10-19
09:00:43 UTC ---
I have bootstrapped revision 180100 on powerpc-apple-darwin9 configured with
../work/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc/gcc4.7w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #3 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-19
10:55:28 UTC ---
Could I have ssh access to one of the boxes that fail?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-19 12:22:04
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Could I have ssh access to one of the boxes that fail?
unfortunately, I can't do that - company boxes here afflicted by company
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-10-19
15:01:47 UTC ---
Could I have ssh access to one of the boxes that fail?
I can give you access to my (slowww) G5 if you mail me your ssh key.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
20 matches
Mail list logo
