http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-23
22:15:53 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Feb 23 22:15:44 2012
New Revision: 184531
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184531
Log:
PR bootstrap/52287
* haifa-sched.c (ra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-23
16:00:58 UTC ---
Created attachment 26736
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26736
Tentative fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-23
15:52:23 UTC ---
I don't think INSN_UID is right for that, I think you want to preserve the
original order of debug insns in that case, and INSN_UID can jump up and down.
So what about
if (MAY_HAVE_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Schmidt 2012-02-23
15:41:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> This reproduces only on Solaris 8 because the sort of the ready list isn't
> stable in the presence of debug insns, given that rank_for_schedule isn't
> anti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-23
15:23:44 UTC ---
This reproduces only on Solaris 8 because the sort of the ready list isn't
stable in the presence of debug insns, given that rank_for_schedule isn't
anti-symmetrical:
if (MAY_HAVE_D
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26684|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-17 11:56:05 UTC ---
> --- Comment #3 from Bernd Schmidt 2012-02-16
> 20:43:03 UTC ---
> Not reproducible with a cross compiler.
I've just verified that reverting your patch allows t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Schmidt 2012-02-16
20:43:03 UTC ---
Not reproducible with a cross compiler.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth 2012-02-16 19:52:40 UTC
---
Created attachment 26684
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26684
preprocessed input
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
--- Comment #1 from Bernd Schmidt 2012-02-16
19:47:29 UTC ---
Please attach the reginfo.ii file.
14 matches
Mail list logo