https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pedzsan at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #15 from Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwallner at salomon
dot at 2012-03-28 08:21:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Do you see any technical issue why Import
Files cannot be used this way for filename-based versioning
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #16 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-28
12:29:29 UTC ---
Symbolic linking or hard linking libNAME.so.1 to libNAME.so doesn't work? I
seem to remember something strange about the way AIX loader followed symbolic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #17 from Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwallner at salomon
dot at 2012-03-28 14:20:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Symbolic linking or hard linking libNAME.so.1 to libNAME.so doesn't work? I
seem to remember something
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #14 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-27
16:38:15 UTC ---
Do you see any technical issue why Import
Files cannot be used this way for filename-based versioning over the
traditional onefile-membername-based
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #11 from Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwallner at salomon
dot at 2012-03-23 09:31:41 UTC ---
Unless IBM does, I don't want to change any default here, nor force anyone to
use -brtl.
What I'm after is:
Give package managers
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #12 from Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwallner at salomon
dot at 2012-03-23 10:29:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Give package managers another choice how to build the packages, out of:
A: libNAME.a(libNAME.so.1)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #13 from Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwallner at salomon
dot at 2012-03-23 16:39:53 UTC ---
Hmm, err, A and B aren't created at the same time by libtool.
Instead, this table really should include static-only libs too:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #6 from Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot
at 2012-03-22 09:10:29 UTC ---
Traditionally, yes.
However, there are Import Files:
They can definitively help for the versioning issue,
and can probably help for the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-22 19:02:23
UTC ---
Can you be a little more specific about how you want to use import files? You
seem to be associating them with -brtl, but that is a separate issue.
GCC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #8 from Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot
at 2012-03-22 20:33:01 UTC ---
I'm still grafting some RFC for gcc-ml with more background info for the
not-so-experienced ones, however I don't mind to discuss that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #9 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-22 21:23:46
UTC ---
Yes, one can re-engineer the GCC and libtool shared library build process on
AIX to try to make AIX look more like SVR4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #10 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-22
23:53:14 UTC ---
I recognize that a lot of FLOSS packages are developed on x86/Linux, but
POWER/AIX is not x86/Linux. Upon further consideration, I am concerned that
your
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #3 from Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot
at 2012-03-21 09:38:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
We should disable libquadmath on AIX. It is not needed or useful there.
Have you tried adding
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #4 from Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot
at 2012-03-21 14:27:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
But the problem isn't with libquadmath itself, but with config-ml.in setting
LD_LIBRARY_PATH to find the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-22 03:00:40
UTC ---
AIX fundamentally wants to handle shared objects differently than
SVR4/Solaris/Linux. AIX wants to package shared objects in an archive, like
normal object
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #1 from Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot
at 2012-03-19 17:20:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 26924
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26924
powerpc-ibm-aix7.1.0.0/ppc64/libquadmath/config.log
19 matches
Mail list logo
