[Bug bootstrap/53321] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-07-04 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321 --- Comment #18 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-04 13:49:24 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Wed Jul 4 13:49:19 2012 New Revision: 189261 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189261 Log: PR middle-end/53321 * ipa.c

[Bug bootstrap/53321] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-07-03 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321 --- Comment #16 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-07-03 15:57:34 UTC --- Following patch fixes testcase failure for me, and also enables lto-bootstrap: --cut here-- Index: ipa.c

[Bug bootstrap/53321] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-07-03 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321 --- Comment #17 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-07-03 18:17:09 UTC --- Created attachment 27736 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27736 Patch that cures various may be used uninitialized errors during LTO bootstrap

[Bug bootstrap/53321] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-07-02 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321 --- Comment #15 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-07-02 09:48:57 UTC --- Jan, can you please fix this bug, profiledbootstrap LTO autotesters are broken for more than a month due to this problem. The reduced testcase is in Comment

[Bug bootstrap/53321] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-06-23 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321 --- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-06-23 14:51:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) Hehe, i still love them ;) But inline summaries are separate of cgraph, so it is not cgraph checker's work to verify it ;)) I

[Bug bootstrap/53321] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-05-28 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/53321] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-05-26 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321 --- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-05-26 10:09:35 UTC --- Reduced testcase: --cut here-- typedef long unsigned int size_t; extern C { extern void *memcpy (void *__dest, __const void *__src, size_t __n); } extern

[Bug bootstrap/53321] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-05-26 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc

[Bug bootstrap/53321] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-05-26 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321 --- Comment #12 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-26 19:42:26 UTC --- Note, btw, that verify_cgraph() doesn't catch this. Honza, you loved checkers so much a few years ago -- maybe this checker (also yours??) should be

[Bug bootstrap/53321] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-05-25 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321 --- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-05-25 20:03:51 UTC --- Created attachment 27500 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27500 Preprocessed source This preprocessed source from the bootstrap fails with -g

[Bug bootstrap/53321] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-05-25 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug bootstrap/53321] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-05-25 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321 --- Comment #9 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-05-25 20:10:54 UTC --- (gdb) bt #0 internal_error (gmsgid=0x1214dd8 vector %s %s domain error, in %s at %s:%u) at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/diagnostic.c:951 #1 0x00ef31a9 in

[Bug bootstrap/53321] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-05-19 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-05-19 18:14:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) I need to add disable-werror otherwise we fail on extra warnings, but with that my bootstrap works. Is it still failing for you? The

[Bug bootstrap/53321] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-05-12 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-12 11:03:01 UTC --- I need to add disable-werror otherwise we fail on extra warnings, but with that my bootstrap works. Is it still failing for you? The unreferenced nodes

[Bug bootstrap/53321] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-05-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot

[Bug bootstrap/53321] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-05-11 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11 15:48:32 UTC --- I fixed identically looking ICE seen on Mozilla build yesterday. Hopefully the boostrap is fixed now, too. Honza

[Bug bootstrap/53321] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-05-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-05-11 15:52:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) I fixed identically looking ICE seen on Mozilla build yesterday. Hopefully the boostrap is fixed now, too. It still fails with the

[Bug bootstrap/53321] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-05-11 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-11 18:25:06 UTC --- was comitted as revision 187382. I am trying profiledbootstrap now. Honza