[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #16 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-02-09 08:02:22 UTC --- I didn't notice that my backport to 4.7 caused: ../../gcc-svn/branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/lto/lto.c:1060:68: warning: format ‘%wx’ expects argument of type

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #17 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-02-09 08:17:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) I didn't notice that my backport to 4.7 caused: ../../gcc-svn/branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/lto/lto.c:1060:68: warning: format

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #18 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-02-09 09:47:51 UTC --- Fixed again on 4.7 branch by #including output.h in lto.c.

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joseph at

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-02-07 10:07:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) I don't see anything wrong with the above HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_HEX_PURE definition. Does this hints and some MinGW specific

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #11 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-07 10:15:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) Adding some CCs. The two changes about using HOST_LONG_LONG_FORMAT are fine. The use of HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_HEX_PURE in

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #13 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-07 18:02:00 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Thu Feb 7 18:01:40 2013 New Revision: 195860 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195860 Log: PR bootstrap/56227 *

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #14 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-07 19:18:40 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Thu Feb 7 19:18:27 2013 New Revision: 195865 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195865 Log: Backport from mainline

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-02-06 16:54:49 UTC --- Created attachment 29374 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29374 proposed patch to use HOST_LONG_LONG_FORMAT Please try to bootstrap

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #2 from Craig Powers craig.powers at gmail dot com 2013-02-06 18:42:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Created attachment 29374 [details] proposed patch to use HOST_LONG_LONG_FORMAT Please try to bootstrap with the

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #3 from Craig Powers craig.powers at gmail dot com 2013-02-06 18:50:34 UTC --- There's another one on line 14622 of gcc/config/i386/i386.c.

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #4 from Craig Powers craig.powers at gmail dot com 2013-02-06 18:54:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) There's another one on line 14622 of gcc/config/i386/i386.c. Doing the same substitution as in ggc-page.c fixes it.

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #5 from Craig Powers craig.powers at gmail dot com 2013-02-06 19:03:10 UTC --- ../../gcc-4.8-20130203/gcc/lto/lto.c: In function 'void lto_resolution_read(spla y_tree, FILE*, lto_file*)':

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-02-06 19:40:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) ../../gcc-4.8-20130203/gcc/lto/lto.c: In function 'void lto_resolution_read(spla y_tree, FILE*, lto_file*)':

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #7 from Craig Powers craig.powers at gmail dot com 2013-02-06 20:19:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) (In reply to comment #5) ../../gcc-4.8-20130203/gcc/lto/lto.c: In function 'void lto_resolution_read(spla y_tree,

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2013-02-07 01:48:56 UTC --- On Wed, 6 Feb 2013, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: The full line is, internal_error (resolution sub id