http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
--- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-03
11:45:06 UTC ---
There is a powerpc64 pool machine available. I believe it's gcc110.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anton at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
--- Comment #5 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2013-05-03
15:01:51 UTC ---
Couldn't reproduce on x86_64, so I am on gcc110 trying to get a
bootstrap compiler build going to reproduce. Also see the dup with
testcase (again
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
--- Comment #6 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-03 15:02:18
UTC ---
Created attachment 30022
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30022
Testcase
Testcase from Anton Blanchard transferred from PR 57161
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
--- Comment #7 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2013-05-03
15:10:50 UTC ---
Thanks for the test case - reproduced with my stage1 compiler on gcc110. Teresa
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:02 AM, dje at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
--- Comment #9 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2013-05-03
15:40:16 UTC ---
The problem is that with the rounding divide, an odd numbered
probability being propagated along a 50-50 branch will be rounded up
along both edges,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
--- Comment #10 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2013-05-03
15:41:14 UTC ---
Hi Steve!
Can you confirm whether the patch I just sent also fixes the mips failure?
Thanks,
Teresa
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:40 AM, sje at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
--- Comment #11 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-03 16:03:48
UTC ---
My mips build seems to be working with the patch. It has gotten past the point
where it died last night but the complete bootstrap isn't finished yet.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
--- Comment #12 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2013-05-03
16:24:33 UTC ---
My powerpc bootstrap completed successfully. Sent patch out for review.
Teresa
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:03 AM, sje at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
--- Comment #13 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-03
17:32:05 UTC ---
Teresa, thanks for the prompt fix!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
Bug #: 57154
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap broken for
powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
16 matches
Mail list logo
