https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
--- Comment #18 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Mon Jun 22 20:48:05 2015
New Revision: 224761
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224761&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-06-22 Vladimir Makarov
PR bootstrap/63740
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
--- Comment #17 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Mon Jun 22 18:45:58 2015
New Revision: 224753
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224753&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-06-22 Vladimir Makarov
PR bootstrap/63740
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
--- Comment #16 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Mon Jun 22 18:17:28 2015
New Revision: 224752
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224752&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-06-22 Vladimir Makarov
PR bootstrap/63740
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
--- Comment #15 from Vladimir Makarov ---
The insn in question is
(insn 3598 3597 6907 395 (parallel [
(set (reg:CC 100 cc)
(compare:CC (reg:SI 307 [ ls$2 ])
(const_int 0 [0])))
(set (r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
Maxim Kuvyrkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org |vmakarov at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
--- Comment #13 from Maxim Kuvyrkov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> Any progress on this?
This has slipped off my radar. Thanks for the ping, I'm working on this now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
--- Comment #11 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
*** Bug 63771 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cltang at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
--- Comment #8 from Aaro Koskinen ---
ICE backtrace seems to be same as in Bug 61430. The fix for that has not been
backported to 4.9 branch. I tested it and it seems to fix the issue at hand.
The fix: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revisi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
--- Comment #7 from Aaro Koskinen ---
Result from bisection (4.9 git branch):
611da9dd72a4c9d9ece2a8d24612e4aee435414a is the first bad commit
commit 611da9dd72a4c9d9ece2a8d24612e4aee435414a
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Oct 1 14:42:46 2014 +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
--- Comment #6 from Aaro Koskinen ---
(In reply to Aaro Koskinen from comment #0)
> GCC 4.9.2 native bootstrap on ARM fails with ICE from the second stage
> compiler:
>
> /home/aaro/gcctest/build/./prev-gcc/xg++
Correction: stage_curr says "sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
--- Comment #5 from Aaro Koskinen ---
Created attachment 33890
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33890&action=edit
haifa-sched.s.gz
haifa-sched.s (gzipped) from -save-temps.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
Aaro Koskinen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33885|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
--- Comment #2 from Aaro Koskinen ---
Created attachment 33885
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33885&action=edit
haifa-sched preprocessed source
This is the preprocessed source of haifa-sched produced with full original xg++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
19 matches
Mail list logo
