https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64612
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64612
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 28 07:45:56 2015
New Revision: 220198
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220198&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/64612
* lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64612
--- Comment #19 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Created attachment 34573
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34573&action=edit
> gcc5-pr64612.patch
>
> Lightly tested patc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64612
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 34573
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34573&action=edit
gcc5-pr64612.patch
Lightly tested patch to do that (tested just on x86_64-linux).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64612
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #16)
> > --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> > If you are willing to cook up an effective-target for that in
> > lib/target-supports.exp, sure, g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64612
--- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> If you are willing to cook up an effective-target for that in
> lib/target-supports.exp, sure, go ahead.
Given the complexity of the HAVE_COM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64612
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
If you are willing to cook up an effective-target for that in
lib/target-supports.exp, sure, go ahead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64612
--- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> g++.dg/abi/comdat1.C is guarded with { target *-*-*gnu* }, perhaps this test
> should be too.
While that would work, it's overeager: the test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64612
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
g++.dg/abi/comdat1.C is guarded with { target *-*-*gnu* }, perhaps this test
should be too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64612
--- Comment #12 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 34511
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34511&action=edit
Solaris 10/x86 assembler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64612
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64612
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
*** Bug 64163 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64612
--- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Author: trippels
Date: Fri Jan 16 11:12:52 2015
New Revision: 219721
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219721&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
g++.dg/ipa/pr64612.C: New test.
2015-01-16 Markus Trippelsdorf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64612
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64612
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Jan 15 23:11:49 2015
New Revision: 219696
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219696&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/64612
* ipa-inline-transform.c (can_remove_node_now_p): Fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64612
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64612
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
Oops, wrong if
Index: ipa-inline-transform.c
===
--- ipa-inline-transform.c (revision 219674)
+++ ipa-inline-transform.c (working copy)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64612
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
I am testing
Index: ipa-inline-transform.c
===
--- ipa-inline-transform.c (revision 219674)
+++ ipa-inline-transform.c (working copy)
@@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64612
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
Seems like dup of PR64583
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64612
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64612
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, in simplify-rtx.o we have:
5238 01190002 R_X86_64_PC32
_ZN16wide_int_storageC1ISt4pairIP7rtx_def12machine_modeEEERKT_ - 4
at that spot, and:
281:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64612
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
22 matches
Mail list logo
