[Bug bootstrap/69611] Bootstrap broken on PowerPC FreeBSD, IEEE 128-bit floating point support.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611 Andreas Tobler changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/69611] Bootstrap broken on PowerPC FreeBSD, IEEE 128-bit floating point support.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611 --- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt --- Andreas, if this is complete, please move to RESOLVED/FIXED state. Thanks!

[Bug bootstrap/69611] Bootstrap broken on PowerPC FreeBSD, IEEE 128-bit floating point support.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Tobler --- Author: andreast Date: Wed Feb 3 22:15:21 2016 New Revision: 233111 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233111=gcc=rev Log: 2016-02-03 Andreas Tobler PR bootstrap/69611

[Bug bootstrap/69611] Bootstrap broken on PowerPC FreeBSD, IEEE 128-bit floating point support.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611 Andreas Tobler changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug bootstrap/69611] Bootstrap broken on PowerPC FreeBSD, IEEE 128-bit floating point support.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611 --- Comment #4 from David Edelsohn --- Joseph, is the patch proposed in the original description okay as fix for stage 4 or you want a __NO_FPRS__ addressed?

[Bug bootstrap/69611] Bootstrap broken on PowerPC FreeBSD, IEEE 128-bit floating point support.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611 --- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner --- On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 11:35:35PM +, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611 > > --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com dot com> --- >

[Bug bootstrap/69611] Bootstrap broken on PowerPC FreeBSD, IEEE 128-bit floating point support.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I think it's OK for stage 4 - the t-hardfp point is that you'd get a smaller, faster libgcc on FreeBSD that way, by not compiling soft-fp at all for non-float128 hard float.

[Bug bootstrap/69611] Bootstrap broken on PowerPC FreeBSD, IEEE 128-bit floating point support.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- If __NO_FPRS__ is undefined, that means you are compiling for classic hard float. Which means that the soft-fp code is not needed - if you need to keep it in libgcc_s.so for binary

[Bug bootstrap/69611] Bootstrap broken on PowerPC FreeBSD, IEEE 128-bit floating point support.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/69611] Bootstrap broken on PowerPC FreeBSD, IEEE 128-bit floating point support.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1