https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80447
--- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #10)
> (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #9)
> >
> > It's possible that the path is not reachable and GCC doesn't see it.
>
> Well, 18 exabytes allocations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80447
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #9)
>
> It's possible that the path is not reachable and GCC doesn't see it.
Well, 18 exabytes allocations or memsets would not go unnoticed for very
long...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80447
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80447
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80447
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80447
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---
OK, thanks. I am trying with --disable-werror now, and hopefully that's all
there is to it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80447
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #4)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #3)
> > I always use --disable-werror to get past these (harmless) warnings.
>
> Is that harmless, though? 18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80447
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #3)
> I always use --disable-werror to get past these (harmless) warnings.
Is that harmless, though? 18446744073709551608 seems like a lot of zeros. :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80447
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80447
--- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt ---
Well, not a 7 regression, this is actually an improvement over GCC 6, where we
fail during the profile-generate stage...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80447
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-linux-gnu
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80447
--- Comment #1 from Bill Schmidt ---
Created attachment 41208
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41208&action=edit
Configuration log
12 matches
Mail list logo
