https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91972
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|easyhack|
--- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91972
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easyhack
--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91972
--- Comment #7 from Alexander Monakov ---
As I understand, only the gcc subdirectory changed implementation language from
C to C++, so, yes (as far as this bug is concerned).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91972
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
To clarify, are we talking about adding it just in the gcc subdirectory, or any
other subdirectories as well?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91972
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #4)
> > Why is it missing the static keyword then? (Or alternatively, why isn't it
> > in an anonymous namespace?)
>
> Huh? Without the warning developers may sim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91972
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Monakov ---
> Why is it missing the static keyword then? (Or alternatively, why isn't it in
> an anonymous namespace?)
Huh? Without the warning developers may simply forget to put the 'static'
keyword. With the war
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91972
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #0)
> > Transition to C++ did not change -Wmissing-prototypes to
> > -Wmissing-declarations, so over time several v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91972
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #0)
> Transition to C++ did not change -Wmissing-prototypes to
> -Wmissing-declarations, so over time several violations crept in. In
> particular this penalizes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91972
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Monakov ---
Another reason to have -Wmissing-declarations is that otherwise mismatches of
unused functions are not caught until it's too late (mismatching definition is
assumed to be an overload of the function decla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91972
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|build |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
10 matches
Mail list logo