https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96492
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96492
--- Comment #5 from Rich Townsend ---
So, given that gcc 4.1.2 is really ancient, I've tried building 10.2 using gcc
9.3.0 instead (but still inside the Docker container). This builds fine, and in
fact I'm happy to go with this workaround.
Howev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96492
--- Comment #4 from Rich Townsend ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Can you run
> gdb --args ./cc1 -quiet -fself-test=../../gcc/gcc/testsuite/selftests
> /dev/null -o /dev/null
> and do
> run
> bt
> ?
[user@6d6cb5609b91 gcc]$ gdb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96492
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Can you run
gdb --args ./cc1 -quiet -fself-test=../../gcc/gcc/testsuite/selftests /dev/null
-o /dev/null
and do
run
bt
?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96492
--- Comment #2 from Rich Townsend ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Did GCC 10.1 work or any older version you tried to build this way in the
> past?
It's worked in 9.2, 9.3, and earlier releases; but not in 10.1.
If I try the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96492
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Did GCC 10.1 work or any older version you tried to build this way in the past?
