[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE with GCC 4.3.4 (SUSE) host compiler

2022-01-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10 regression] ICE |[10 regression] ICE

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

2021-04-08 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 --- Comment #18 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils I use on there is (GNU Binutils) 2.23.52.20130522

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

2021-04-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.3|10.4 --- Comment #17 from Richard

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

2021-04-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

2021-04-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 --- Comment #16 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 50528 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50528=edit preprocessed source of fold-const.c This is the preprocessed source of fold-const.c with the offending function.

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

2021-04-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener --- Dump of assembler code from 0x1094366c to 0x109436e0: 0x1094366c : lhz r0,0(r9) 0x10943670 : clrldi r0,r0,48 0x10943674 : stw r0,200(r31)

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

2021-04-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13) > So I can confirm the issue trying to build gcc10 packages for SLE11 ppc64 > (after much massaging). It works fine (past the failure point) on x86_64 > with

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

2021-04-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- So I can confirm the issue trying to build gcc10 packages for SLE11 ppc64 (after much massaging). It works fine (past the failure point) on x86_64 with the same versioned host compiler. It works fine

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

2021-04-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Usually I'm trying to do binary search in these cases, build one tree with the bad compiler, one with good one, cp -al one of the trees to a new dir, make a list of the object files, start with half/half,

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

2021-04-07 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 --- Comment #11 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Swapping out those two .o files (individually and together) didn't yield a successful build. I brought in the 8.4.0 .o files in one at a time and eventually I got a successful build but at that

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

2021-04-07 Thread rguenther at suse dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 7 Apr 2021, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 > > --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- > Built r152973 ../configure

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

2021-04-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Built r152973 ../configure --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=c,c++ , installed and built gcc trunk with that as system compiler and can't reproduce it. Maybe some SUSE patches or the SUSE compiler was

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

2021-04-06 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- It is during stage1 and I was able to recreate using the system distro compiler, gcc version 4.3.4 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 152973] (SUSE Linux). I will bisect on the .o's now. FWIW here is a

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

2021-04-06 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 --- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I will try to recreate but I got rid of the old build compiler. It was a leftover from some work many years ago and I had forgotten I was even using it.

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

2021-04-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-04-06 Resolution|INVALID

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

2021-04-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 10 doesn't require C++11 and so in theory everything from GCC 4.1 till GCC 11 should be supported as system compiler, perhaps we need some workaround for some known bugs somewhere (we have a couple of

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

2021-04-06 Thread rguenther at suse dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 6 Apr 2021, seurer at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 > > seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

2021-04-06 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

2021-04-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Can't reproduce btw, ../configure --enable-languages=c,fortran,c++ --with-cpu=power7 --enable-bootstrap --enable-multilib on gcc110.fsffrance.org built just fine.

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

2021-04-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Could you please attach preprocessed source so that I can try to look at it quickly with a cross-compiler? Thanks.

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

2021-04-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---