https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100409
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100409
Bug 100409 depends on bug 101087, which changed state.
Bug 101087 Summary: [9 Regression] Unevaluated operand of sizeof affects
noexcept operator
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101087
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100409
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14)
> Does that mean C++ should default to -fdelete-dead-exceptions?
That makes sense. The C++ standard has nothing to say about this, since
pure/const are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100409
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #13)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> > - if (! TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (expr))
> > + if (! TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (expr) && expr_noexcept_p (expr, 0))
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100409
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> - if (! TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (expr))
> + if (! TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (expr) && expr_noexcept_p (expr, 0))
> expr = void_node;
The assumption that an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100409
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100409
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||101087
--- Comment #11 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100409
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> Jason, any idea?
diff --git a/gcc/cp/except.c b/gcc/cp/except.c
index a8cea53cf91..cbc94dff790 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/except.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/except.c
@@ -1050,7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100409
--- Comment #9 from Harald van Dijk ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> It has been consensus that throwing exceptions and const/pure are different
> concepts that co-exist. See for example the recent discussion at
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100409
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Harald van Dijk from comment #4)
> The documentation for the pure attribute refers to "functions that have no
> observable effects on the state of the program other than to return a value"
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100409
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100409
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 51116
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51116=edit
patch I was testing
I was testing this patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100409
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, doesn't quite work.
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/sfinae19.C -std=c++14 (internal compiler error)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/sfinae22.C -std=c++14 (internal compiler error)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/pr61636-2.C -std=c++14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100409
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100409
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
So I'm looking again at this. For the simple cases I have at hand we can
fix the C++ FE issue with
diff --git a/gcc/cp/cvt.c b/gcc/cp/cvt.c
index d035e611be4..81097942449 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/cvt.c
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100409
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
After the PR100394 fix this is now the prevailing issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100409
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #1 from
17 matches
Mail list logo
