https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:742b4b7a644dbb4dd4a5f26c91380db826a6de07
commit r11-8491-g742b4b7a644dbb4dd4a5f26c91380db826a6de07
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
r230324 changed the dependency for std::to_string from _GLIBCXX_USE_C99 to
_GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDIO, which means it's enabled for more targets (you don't
need the full C99 math library, for example!) That
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731
--- Comment #8 from Harald van Dijk ---
I take it that means there's no need for me to continue with what Richard asked
me to do?
At any rate, it looks like this fix won't be enough for GCC 12, but that's an
issue with the environment, not GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7a5e9a58fbe27d8b8f04cd18bc6e1dd736e3cd12
commit r12-1041-g7a5e9a58fbe27d8b8f04cd18bc6e1dd736e3cd12
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731
--- Comment #6 from Harald van Dijk ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5)
> At this point a minimal fix is prefered - in principle the file
> should be a valid source to any C++ 11 capable host compiler, not
> just GCC. The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 25 May 2021, harald at gigawatt dot nl wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731
>
> --- Comment #4 from Harald van Dijk ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731
--- Comment #4 from Harald van Dijk ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
Yes, including is enough to get the build to pass. My last point in
comment #2, however, means that that leaves things in an inconsistent state and
that the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|GCC 11 fails to build using |[11/12 Regression] GCC 11
