[Bug c++/101029] [10/11/12 regression] unexpected error: non-constant condition for static assertion in gcc 10/11, but not 9 (clang also fine)

2021-07-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.4 Resolution|---

[Bug c++/101029] [10/11/12 regression] unexpected error: non-constant condition for static assertion in gcc 10/11, but not 9 (clang also fine)

2021-06-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b98b55e0e8b4051f4e3b0afc76b506b01f0889f commit r10-9926-g4b98b55e0e8b4051f4e3b0afc76b506b01f0889f Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/101029] [10/11/12 regression] unexpected error: non-constant condition for static assertion in gcc 10/11, but not 9 (clang also fine)

2021-06-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da25516718cb150cc938f5947650c9ab486505c6 commit r11-8586-gda25516718cb150cc938f5947650c9ab486505c6 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/101029] [10/11/12 regression] unexpected error: non-constant condition for static assertion in gcc 10/11, but not 9 (clang also fine)

2021-06-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff4deb4b1d0c5947669ddc76fde4db83e28009d8 commit r12-1548-gff4deb4b1d0c5947669ddc76fde4db83e28009d8 Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug c++/101029] [10/11/12 regression] unexpected error: non-constant condition for static assertion in gcc 10/11, but not 9 (clang also fine)

2021-06-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d92613ec5529cecd66ef0c21b894c7f70ace7f87 commit r11-8582-gd92613ec5529cecd66ef0c21b894c7f70ace7f87 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/101029] [10/11/12 regression] unexpected error: non-constant condition for static assertion in gcc 10/11, but not 9 (clang also fine)

2021-06-16 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- It's only fixed on trunk so far, which will become the 12.1 release in 10-11 months. It's a regression, so either the compiler fix should get backported to the release branches (including the gcc-10 branc

[Bug c++/101029] [10/11/12 regression] unexpected error: non-constant condition for static assertion in gcc 10/11, but not 9 (clang also fine)

2021-06-16 Thread jim.w.walker at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029 --- Comment #7 from Jim Walker --- Thanks for the fast work on this issue. How does it work for gcc bugs in terms of getting into a release? Would there be a 10.x release that includes this?

[Bug c++/101029] [10/11/12 regression] unexpected error: non-constant condition for static assertion in gcc 10/11, but not 9 (clang also fine)

2021-06-12 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08e1ff9d6e5a419d5b4a60c077df549e81601d9b commit r12-1404-g08e1ff9d6e5a419d5b4a60c077df549e81601d9b Author: Jason Merrill Date: F

[Bug c++/101029] [10/11/12 regression] unexpected error: non-constant condition for static assertion in gcc 10/11, but not 9 (clang also fine)

2021-06-11 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Summary|unexpected error: