https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102378
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.4|12.5
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102378
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.3|12.4
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102378
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.2|12.3
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102378
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.0|12.2
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102378
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102378
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
With the correct explicit instantiation directive things look much better:
$ cat pr102378.C && gcc -S -Wall pr102378.C
int f ()
{
int a[2];
return &a == 0; // -Waddress (good)
}
template
int g ()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102378
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|missing -Waddress in|missing -Waddress in
