https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103760
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rekerner at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103760
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to danakj from comment #7)
> MSVC and Clang both accept this code, which GCC rejects. Is it the same
> issue and GCC is compliant here?
I think so because of this part:
"so substitution failure fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103760
danakj at orodu dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danakj at orodu dot net
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103760
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||avr5309 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103760
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Jacek Olczyk from comment #4)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #2)
> > GCC's behavior appears to be correct here (though perhaps less useful than
> > Clang's). According to wg21.link/t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103760
--- Comment #4 from Jacek Olczyk ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #2)
> GCC's behavior appears to be correct here (though perhaps less useful than
> Clang's). According to wg21.link/temp.deduct.general#9 a lambda expression
> isn't p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103760
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103760
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103760
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
--- Comment #1 from Andre
